Division · No. 331Wednesday, 29 October 2025Commons Constitution and Democracy

European Convention on Human Rights (withdrawal): Ten Minute Rule Motion

96
Ayes
154
Noes
Defeated · Government won
396 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 29 October 2025, MPs voted on a Ten Minute Rule motion proposing that the United Kingdom should withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights. The motion was defeated by 154 votes to 96. A Ten Minute Rule motion is a procedural device that allows a backbench MP to make a brief case for a piece of proposed legislation, giving Parliament an opportunity to register its view without committing to a full bill. **Why it matters:** The ECHR is an international treaty, administered by the Council of Europe, that underpins fundamental rights protections across the UK's legal system. The Human Rights Act 1998 incorporates ECHR rights directly into domestic law, meaning withdrawal would require further legislative steps to unpick those protections. UK membership also has implications for the Good Friday Agreement and for trade and co-operation arrangements with European partners. A vote to withdraw would signal a significant shift in the UK's international commitments, though as a non-binding motion this result is symbolic rather than legally operative. **The politics:** The 96 votes in favour came almost entirely from Conservatives (85 MPs) and Reform UK (7 MPs), with two Democratic Unionist Party members and two independents also voting aye. All 154 opposing votes came from Liberal Democrats (66), Labour (63), the SNP (7), Plaid Cymru (4), the Greens (4), Labour and Co-operative MPs (4), and five independents. Not a single Conservative or Reform MP voted against the motion. Labour's opposition was limited by a very large number of absences, with 299 Labour MPs not voting, suggesting the party did not treat this as a high-priority whipped division. The result places the motion firmly within a pattern of right-of-centre pressure to loosen ties with European human rights institutions, a debate that has intensified in Conservative and Reform politics since the Brexit era.

Voting Aye meant
Support giving Parliament permission to consider withdrawing the UK from the ECHR, arguing it would restore parliamentary sovereignty and allow the UK to control immigration and deportation without interference from Strasbourg judges.
Voting No meant
Oppose withdrawing from the ECHR, defending the Convention as a vital protection of human rights and rejecting the argument that leaving it is a necessary consequence of Brexit or parliamentary sovereignty.
§ 01Who voted how.250 voting members · 396 absent
Aye97No157DID NOT VOTE · 396

250 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 396 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
63
299
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
85
0
31
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
66
6
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
4
38
Independent
2
5
6
Scottish National PartyWhipped No
0
7
2
Reform UKWhipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.3 principal speakers
Nigel FarageSupportiveClacton
UK should withdraw from ECHR to restore parliamentary sovereignty, control borders, and replace European judges' interpretations with British common law traditions.Reform UK · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,429 words)
Ed DaveyOpposedKingston and Surbiton
ECHR withdrawal mirrors Putin's Russia and Trump's America; the convention protects vulnerable people, enables justice in major cases, and is fundamental to the Good Friday Agreement and Britain's soft power.Liberal Democrats · Voted no · Read full speech (1,486 words)
Steve DarlingOpposedTorbay
Interjected dismissively, characterising Farage's position as aligned with Putin.Unknown · Voted no · Read full speech (4 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0