A divisionDivision No. 331 · Wednesday, 29 October 2025· Commons· Constitution and Democracy

European Convention on Human Rights (withdrawal): Ten Minute Rule Motion

96Ayes
154Noes
Defeated · majority 58 · Government won
396 did not vote
Aye96No154DID NOT VOTE · 396

646 Members · Aye 96 · No 154 · DNV 396 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

MPs voted on 29 October 2025 on whether Nigel Farage should be allowed to introduce a Bill to withdraw the United Kingdom from the European Convention on Human Rights. The motion was defeated by 154 votes to 96. The procedure used was a Ten Minute Rule Motion, which gives a backbench MP a brief opportunity to make the case for a new Bill and test whether the House will grant leave to bring it in. The practical consequence of the defeat is that Farage cannot proceed with this particular Bill through this route. The vote touched on significant questions of constitutional law, specifically whether the UK should remain bound by the ECHR, remain subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, and retain the Human Rights Act 1998, which incorporated the Convention into domestic law. The Bill would also have affected immigration and deportation decisions that have at times been subject to challenge under the Convention. The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 85 Conservative MPs who voted backed the Ayes, as did all 7 Reform UK members who voted and 2 DUP members. Labour MPs, Liberal Democrats, the SNP, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and most independents voted No. However, 298 Labour MPs and 38 Labour and Co-operative MPs had no vote recorded, as did 31 Conservatives, meaning the active opposition to the Bill was driven largely by Liberal Democrats and Labour MPs who did participate.

Voting Aye meant
Support withdrawing the UK from the European Convention on Human Rights, restoring parliamentary sovereignty over human rights law and removing the jurisdiction of the Strasbourg court
Voting No meant
Oppose withdrawing from the ECHR, defending the Convention's protections for British citizens and rejecting the argument that membership undermines sovereignty
§ 01Who voted how.250 voting Members · 396 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.

Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted No
0
63
298
Conservative and Unionist Party
Voted Aye
85
0
31
Liberal Democrats
Voted No
0
65
6
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted No
0
4
38
Independent
1
5
7
Scottish National Party
Voted No
0
7
2
Reform UK
Voted Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Voted No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Voted No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Your Party
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
1
0
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division

Votes by party (CSV) · Premium
§ 02From the debate.3 principal speakers
Nigel FarageSupportiveClacton
UK should withdraw from ECHR to restore parliamentary sovereignty, control borders, and replace European judges' interpretations with British common law traditions.Reform UK · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,429 words)
Ed DaveyOpposedKingston and Surbiton
ECHR withdrawal mirrors Putin's Russia and Trump's America; the convention protects vulnerable people, enables justice in major cases, and is fundamental to the Good Friday Agreement and Britain's soft power.Liberal Democrats · Voted no · Read full speech (1,486 words)
Steve DarlingOpposedTorbay
Interjected dismissively, characterising Farage's position as aligned with Putin.Unknown · Voted no · Read full speech (4 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0