Division · No. 324Tuesday, 21 October 2025Commons Crime & Policing

Sentencing Bill Committee: New Clause 30

77
Ayes
390
Noes
Defeated · Government won
183 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on 21 October 2025 on New Clause 30, a proposed addition to the Sentencing Bill at committee stage. The clause was defeated by 390 votes to 77. The amendment sought to add provisions to the Bill beyond those the government had included in its own draft. **Why it matters:** The Sentencing Bill is a significant piece of criminal justice legislation affecting how courts in England and Wales impose and manage sentences, with implications for prison capacity and offender management. By rejecting New Clause 30, the Commons kept the Bill in the form the government preferred, blocking whatever additional obligations or changes the clause would have introduced. The defeat means those policy provisions will not become law unless reintroduced through another vehicle. **The politics:** The vote divided sharply along party lines. The Liberal Democrats provided the overwhelming majority of the Aye votes, with 65 of their members supporting the clause, while Plaid Cymru and the Greens each contributed 4 Aye votes and a small number of independents also backed it. Labour and the Conservatives both voted against, with 264 Labour and 86 Conservative members in the No lobby, reflecting a cross-bench coalition holding the government line. Notably, two Labour members broke with their party to vote Aye. The result sits within a broader pattern visible in related divisions: government amendments and opposition proposals to the Sentencing Bill have consistently been defeated at both committee and report stages in the autumn of 2025.

Voting Aye meant
Support introducing a new provision to the Sentencing Bill, likely restricting the use of short custodial sentences or strengthening presumptions in favour of suspended sentences
Voting No meant
Oppose the new clause, preferring the existing Bill approach to sentencing reform without this additional provision
§ 01Who voted how.467 voting members · 183 absent
Aye80No386DID NOT VOTE · 183

467 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 183 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
2
264
96
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
86
30
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
65
0
7
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
24
18
Independent
4
4
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
1
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
5
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
Your Party
1
0
§ 02From the debate.4 principal speakers
Esther McVeyOpposedTatton
Opposes the Bill as fundamentally undermining law and order by forcing suspended sentences when imprisonment is appropriate; advocates for narrower application of presumption and tougher exclusions for serious offences including knife crime.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (4,517 words)
Sally JamesonSupportiveDoncaster Central
Defends the Bill against accusations that it undermines law and order; argues the previous Conservative government nearly collapsed the prison system through poor management.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (255 words)
Sir Desmond SwayneOpposedNew Forest West
Supports McVey's position that the Bill is worse than the previous approach; argues active prison management was preferable to reducing incarceration.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (186 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Concerned that the Bill removes deterrent effect for knife crime; argues sentencing must be carried out and deterrents maintained, citing tragic family impacts in constituencies.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (95 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0