Sentencing Bill Committee: New Clause 9
104
Ayes
—
317
Noes
Defeated · Government won
224 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on 21 October 2025 on New Clause 9, an opposition amendment to the Sentencing Bill at committee stage. The amendment was defeated by 317 votes to 104. The government opposed the clause, and its majority in the Commons was sufficient to block it. **Why it matters:** The Sentencing Bill is the government's vehicle for reforming how custodial sentences are handed down and served, alongside broader changes to the prison system. New Clause 9 sought to modify or constrain elements of that framework. Its defeat means the government's preferred approach to sentencing and prison reform proceeds without the changes the amendment's supporters argued for, keeping policy on the trajectory ministers have set out. **The politics:** The vote divided largely along party lines. All 277 Labour MPs and 26 Labour and Co-operative members who voted came down against the clause, while 90 Conservatives voted for it, alongside the five Democratic Unionist Party members, four Reform UK members, and both the Traditional Unionist Voice and Ulster Unionist Party representatives. Notably, four Green MPs and all four Plaid Cymru members voted with the government against the amendment, while five Independents backed it and seven voted no. The result is consistent with the pattern seen at the Sentencing Bill's later Report Stage on 29 October 2025, where a series of further opposition new clauses were also defeated by comparable margins.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring courts to publish offender nationality and immigration status data, arguing it enables better-informed policy on borders and criminal justice
Voting No meant
Oppose the mandatory collection and rapid publication of offender nationality/immigration status data, likely on grounds of practicality, privacy, or that it is unnecessary or divisive
421 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 224 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
277
85
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal Democrats
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
26
16
Independent
5
7
1
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5
0
—
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
—
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
4
—
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
—
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
0
1
—
Opposes the Bill as fundamentally undermining law and order by forcing suspended sentences when imprisonment is appropriate; advocates for narrower application of presumption and tougher exclusions for serious offences including knife crime.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,517 words) →
Defends the Bill against accusations that it undermines law and order; argues the previous Conservative government nearly collapsed the prison system through poor management.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (255 words) →
Supports McVey's position that the Bill is worse than the previous approach; argues active prison management was preferable to reducing incarceration.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (186 words) →
Concerned that the Bill removes deterrent effect for knife crime; argues sentencing must be carried out and deterrents maintained, citing tragic family impacts in constituencies.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (95 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0