Division · No. 321Tuesday, 21 October 2025Commons Crime & Policing

Sentencing Bill Committee: Amendment 24

182
Ayes
307
Noes
Defeated · Government won
157 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on Amendment 24 to the Sentencing Bill at committee stage on 21 October 2025. The amendment, which proposed changes to criminal sentencing guidelines or procedures in a direction broadly associated with reform and rehabilitation rather than punitive approaches, was defeated by 307 votes to 182. **Why it matters:** The defeat of Amendment 24 means the Sentencing Bill continues on its current trajectory without the modifications this amendment sought to introduce. The vote represents a decision by Parliament to maintain the government's preferred approach to sentencing rather than incorporating changes that supporters argued would have moved the framework toward greater rehabilitation. The outcome directly affects how courts will approach sentencing decisions, with implications for offenders, victims, and the prison and probation systems. **The politics:** The vote produced a striking cross-party coalition in favour of the amendment, with Conservatives (90 ayes), Liberal Democrats (65 ayes), the Democratic Unionist Party (5 ayes), Plaid Cymru (4 ayes), Reform UK (4 ayes), Greens (3 ayes), and a number of independents all voting in support. Labour overwhelmingly opposed it, with 279 Labour MPs and 26 Labour and Co-operative MPs voting no, and only a single Labour MP breaking ranks to back the amendment. This placed the government in the unusual position of being opposed by parties spanning from the Greens and Plaid Cymru on the left to Reform UK and the Conservatives on the right, yet prevailing comfortably on the strength of its parliamentary majority.

Voting Aye meant
Support the Conservative opposition's Amendment 24 to the Sentencing Bill, seeking to modify the government's sentencing reform proposals
Voting No meant
Reject the Conservative amendment and support the government's Sentencing Bill as drafted, opposing the opposition's changes to suspended sentence and recall provisions
§ 01Who voted how.489 voting members · 157 absent
Aye184No308DID NOT VOTE · 157

489 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 157 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
1
279
82
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
65
0
7
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
26
16
Independent
9
3
1
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5
0
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
1
0
§ 02From the debate.4 principal speakers
Esther McVeyOpposedTatton
Opposes the Bill as fundamentally undermining law and order by forcing suspended sentences when imprisonment is appropriate; advocates for narrower application of presumption and tougher exclusions for serious offences including knife crime.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,517 words)
Sally JamesonSupportiveDoncaster Central
Defends the Bill against accusations that it undermines law and order; argues the previous Conservative government nearly collapsed the prison system through poor management.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (255 words)
Sir Desmond SwayneOpposedNew Forest West
Supports McVey's position that the Bill is worse than the previous approach; argues active prison management was preferable to reducing incarceration.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (186 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Concerned that the Bill removes deterrent effect for knife crime; argues sentencing must be carried out and deterrents maintained, citing tragic family impacts in constituencies.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (95 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0