Division · No. 319Tuesday, 21 October 2025Commons Crime & Policing

Sentencing Bill Committee: Amendment 46

105
Ayes
381
Noes
Defeated · Government won
164 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on Amendment 46 to the Sentencing Bill at committee stage on 21 October 2025. The amendment was defeated by 381 votes to 105. The amendment was tabled by Conservative MPs and attracted support from the Democratic Unionist Party, Reform UK, the Ulster Unionist Party, Traditional Unionist Voice, and several independent members, but was opposed by Labour, the Labour and Co-operative Party, the Liberal Democrats, and the Green Party. **Why it matters:** The Sentencing Bill represents a significant piece of criminal justice legislation, and this amendment sought to alter its sentencing or prison-related provisions in a direction broadly characterised as more punitive or restrictive compared to the government's approach. Its defeat means the government's preferred framework for sentencing reform remains intact at this stage. The outcome affects how courts sentence offenders and how the prison system operates going forward, with practical implications for prison populations, rehabilitation programmes, and public safety outcomes across England and Wales. **The politics:** The vote produced an unusual cross-party alignment, with Conservatives, the DUP, Reform UK, and smaller unionist parties voting together in favour of the amendment against the government. Labour, the Liberal Democrats, and the Greens held a firm opposing bloc, reflecting the government's commanding majority. No Labour or Liberal Democrat MPs broke ranks. The amendment's defeat is consistent with a pattern visible in related votes during the Sentencing Bill's passage, where government-backed positions have consistently prevailed by wide margins, and it sets the stage for further contested divisions at report stage later in October 2025.

Voting Aye meant
Support tightening the suspended sentence threshold and limiting the Bill's scope so that serious offenders are less likely to avoid immediate custody
Voting No meant
Oppose this amendment, backing the government's existing wording in the Sentencing Bill which retains the 'not more than 12 months' threshold for suspended sentences
§ 01Who voted how.486 voting members · 164 absent
Aye106No379DID NOT VOTE · 164

486 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 164 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
283
79
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
63
9
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
26
16
Independent
4
3
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
5
0
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5
0
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
0
1
§ 02From the debate.4 principal speakers
Esther McVeyOpposedTatton
Opposes the Bill as fundamentally undermining law and order by forcing suspended sentences when imprisonment is appropriate; advocates for narrower application of presumption and tougher exclusions for serious offences including knife crime.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,517 words)
Sally JamesonSupportiveDoncaster Central
Defends the Bill against accusations that it undermines law and order; argues the previous Conservative government nearly collapsed the prison system through poor management.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (255 words)
Sir Desmond SwayneOpposedNew Forest West
Supports McVey's position that the Bill is worse than the previous approach; argues active prison management was preferable to reducing incarceration.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (186 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Concerned that the Bill removes deterrent effect for knife crime; argues sentencing must be carried out and deterrents maintained, citing tragic family impacts in constituencies.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (95 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0