Division · No. 66Wednesday, 11 December 2024Commons Taxation

Finance Bill Committee: New Clause 8

167
Ayes
329
Noes
Defeated · Government won
153 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened** On 11 December 2024, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 8 to the Finance Bill during its Committee stage. The clause would have required the Secretary of State to make formal statements to Parliament on the impact of removing VAT exemption from private school fees, with particular attention to pupils with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND), small rural schools, and faith schools. The amendment was defeated by 329 votes to 167, with the government commanding a comfortable majority. **Why it matters** The underlying policy at issue is the government's decision, introduced through clauses 47 to 49 of the Finance Bill, to remove the longstanding VAT exemption on private school fees with effect from January 2025. This measure is forecast to raise approximately 460 million pounds in additional revenue in the 2024-25 financial year, money the government intends to direct toward state education, including a 2.3 billion pound increase to the core schools budget. New Clause 8 would not have reversed that decision, but would have obliged ministers to formally account to Parliament for its effects on vulnerable groups of pupils and smaller institutions. Its defeat means the government faces no statutory reporting requirement on those impacts, even as critics warn that SEND pupils without Education, Health and Care plans, small faith schools, and families relying on armed forces continuity of education allowances face particular pressures. **The politics** The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 283 Labour MPs and 31 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the amendment, while all 98 voting Conservatives and all 60 voting Liberal Democrats supported it. Reform UK and the Democratic Unionist Party also voted in favour. Smaller parties including the Greens and Plaid Cymru voted with the government. There were no notable rebellions on either side. The debate was combative, with Conservative MPs characterising the mid-year introduction of the measure as harmful and ideologically driven, while Labour ministers defended it as a necessary and fair reallocation of resources toward universal state education. The policy sits within a broader contested Budget following the October 2024 Autumn Statement, and the Finance Bill subsequently passed its Third Reading in March 2025 by 339 votes to 172.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring a government impact assessment of VAT on private school fees, particularly regarding SEND pupils, small rural schools, and faith schools
Voting No meant
Oppose the reporting requirement, backing the government's decision to proceed with VAT on private school fees without mandating additional parliamentary scrutiny
§ 01Who voted how.496 voting members · 153 absent
Aye169No327DID NOT VOTE · 153

496 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 153 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
283
79
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
98
0
18
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
60
0
12
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
31
11
Independent
5
4
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
3
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
0
1
§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
James MurraySupportiveEaling North
Defends VAT removal as necessary to raise £1.5bn for state education investment; argues schools can minimise fee increases and that government has compensated SEND pupils with EHCPs and military families via continuity of education allowance.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,534 words)
James WildOpposedNorth West Norfolk
Opposes VAT on private school fees as a cruel, ideological tax imposed mid-year that will damage education of 37,000 pupils and particularly harm SEND pupils without EHCPs, small rural schools, and faith schools; calls for new clause 8 to review impact.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,696 words)
Munira WilsonOpposedTwickenham
Opposes the tax on principle; supports new clause 9 requiring impact assessment on SEND pupils without EHCPs, warning 100,000 such pupils will face fee rises and families may seek EHCPs to avoid VAT, straining the already-failed SEND system.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,053 words)
Euan StainbankSupportiveFalkirk
Supports removal of VAT exemption as fair redistribution from wealthiest to fund state education crisis; notes private school spending per pupil is 90% higher than state sector and fees have risen 55% since 2003.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (905 words)
Damian HindsOpposedEast Hampshire
Opposes as bad policy that taxes education contrary to global norm; argues Government's 37,000 pupil displacement estimate is mathematically flawed, ignores capital costs, and will disproportionately displace SEND and faith school pupils.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,799 words)
Dr Jeevun SandherSupportiveLoughborough
Supports as part of philosophy that those with broadest shoulders carry heaviest load; argues 6% at private schools vs 50% using state education justifies the measure to fund prosperity for all.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,027 words)
Shivani RajaOpposedLeicester East
Opposes as tax on aspiration that harms ordinary working families (nurses, tradespeople, small business owners) who sacrificed to afford independent schools; criticises lack of proper impact assessment and mid-year implementation.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (674 words)
Dr Kieran MullanOpposedBexhill and Battle
Opposes as divisive framing that pits schoolchild against schoolchild; argues Government wrongly suggests not taxing private fees takes money from state schools, when UK spends £1trn+ annually and can choose priorities.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (750 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0