Division · No. 107Wednesday, 26 February 2025Commons Business

Opposition Day: Family businesses

108
Ayes
313
Noes
Defeated · Government won
226 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on 26 February 2025 on a Conservative Opposition Day motion calling for support for family businesses, with particular focus on inheritance tax relief and reducing regulatory burdens. The motion was defeated by 313 votes to 108, a margin of 205. **Why it matters:** The vote centred on whether Parliament would formally endorse special inheritance tax relief for family businesses, a policy directly relevant to how family-owned firms are passed between generations. The existing Agricultural and Business Property Relief (APR and BPR) regimes had been targeted for reform in the October 2024 Budget, with the government proposing to cap the relief available, and this motion represented an attempt by the Opposition to force a parliamentary statement of support for those reliefs in their existing or expanded form. A defeat meant no such endorsement was recorded, and the government's planned changes faced no parliamentary check from this vote. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 102 participating Conservative MPs voted for the motion, joined by four Reform UK MPs, two Democratic Unionists, and two independents. All 311 participating Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against. The Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru, the SNP and the SDLP did not vote. The Ulster Unionist Party voted no. The result reflects the government's comfortable Commons majority and the Conservative Party's use of Opposition Day time to highlight its disagreement with Labour's inheritance tax changes, placing the debate within a broader pattern of Conservative opposition to the October 2024 Budget measures affecting farms and family businesses.

Voting Aye meant
Support the Conservative motion expressing concern about the impact of government policy on family businesses and calling for protective measures
Voting No meant
Reject the Conservative motion, defending the government's economic approach and its treatment of family businesses
§ 01Who voted how.421 voting members · 226 absent
Aye110No314DID NOT VOTE · 226

421 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 226 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
282
80
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
102
0
14
Liberal Democrats
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
29
13
Independent
2
1
11
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4
0
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Sir Mel StrideOpposedCentral Devon
Family businesses face ruin from inheritance tax cap on Business Property Relief, National Insurance rises, and Employment Rights Bill; government lacks business experience and is most anti-business in modern history.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,969 words)
James MurraySupportiveEaling North
Inheritance tax reforms on BPR and APR are necessary and fair, affecting only wealthy estates; National Insurance rise is fairest way to fund NHS; small businesses protected through employment allowance doubling.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,258 words)
Daisy CooperNeutralSt Albans
Acknowledges value of family businesses but criticises both parties: Conservatives for past failures (Brexit, mini-budget), Labour for NIC rises and business rates changes that harm small firms.Liberal Democrat · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,519 words)
Joy MorrisseyOpposedBeaconsfield
Government policies create hostile environment for family business hiring and investment; National Insurance raid forces impossible choices between cutting jobs or closing.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (931 words)
Bradley ThomasOpposedBromsgrove
Labour defaults to raising taxes rather than supporting businesses; family business tax threatens 125,000 job losses and £9.4bn output reduction.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,490 words)
Kanishka NarayanSupportiveVale of Glamorgan
Family businesses benefit from employment allowance doubling, fixed corporation tax, late payment reforms, and AI adoption support; 96% unaffected by BPR changes.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,114 words)
Mark FergusonSupportiveGateshead Central and Whickham
Employment Rights Bill protects workers with day one rights and elimination of zero-hours contracts; Government inherited wrecked high streets from Conservatives.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,263 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0