Division · No. 19Tuesday, 15 October 2024Commons Constitution and Democracy

House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill: Reasoned Amendment to Second Reading

105
Ayes
453
Noes
Defeated · Government won
88 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 15 October 2024, the House of Commons voted on a Conservative reasoned amendment (a procedural motion to reject a Bill at its second reading stage without allowing it to proceed further) to the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill. The amendment sought to block the Bill, which would end the automatic right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords. The amendment was defeated by 453 votes to 105, allowing the Bill to proceed. **Why it matters:** The Bill, if passed, would remove the remaining 92 hereditary peers from the Lords, completing a process begun by the Blair government in 1999. That earlier reform expelled most hereditary peers but left 92 as a temporary compromise. This legislation targets that remaining group. The change would affect the composition of one of Parliament's two chambers and alter how laws are scrutinised and amended, removing members who sit by virtue of inherited title rather than appointment or election. **The politics:** The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 100 voting Conservatives backed the amendment to block the Bill, joined by all 5 Reform UK MPs and 2 independents. Every voting Labour, Labour and Co-operative, Liberal Democrat, Plaid Cymru, Green, SDLP and TUV member opposed the amendment, supporting the Bill's progression. There were no Conservative votes against their own amendment and no government-side rebellions. The Bill continued through Parliament, with related divisions in November 2024 showing similarly large government majorities defeating Conservative attempts to amend it at committee stage.

Voting Aye meant
Support blocking the Bill, opposing the removal of hereditary peers from the House of Lords and resisting this stage of Lords reform
Voting No meant
Support the Bill proceeding, backing the government's plan to end the hereditary principle in the Lords as a first step in Lords reform
§ 01Who voted how.558 voting members · 88 absent
Aye107No454DID NOT VOTE · 88

558 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 88 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
327
35
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
100
0
16
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
68
4
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
39
3
Independent
2
7
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
0
5
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.1 principal speaker
Sir Oliver DowdenOpposedHertsmere
Opposed to the bill, arguing it enacts major constitutional change without consensus, proper scrutiny, or consideration of its place within broader House of Lords reform.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0