King's Speech (Motion for an Address): Amendment (d)
103
Ayes
—
363
Noes
Defeated · Government won
183 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** On 23 July 2024, the House of Commons voted on Amendment (d) to the Loyal Address (the formal parliamentary motion responding to the King's Speech, which sets out the new government's legislative programme). The amendment, tabled to register opposition to or seek changes to the government's agenda, was defeated by 363 votes to 103. **Why it matters:** The King's Speech debate is the first major parliamentary test for any new government, and amendments to the Loyal Address allow opposition parties to put alternative policy priorities on record. Defeating this amendment cleared the path for the Labour government's legislative programme, covering areas including constitutional and democratic reform, to proceed without formal parliamentary challenge at this early stage. While the defeat of an opposition amendment in these circumstances was expected given Labour's large majority, the vote established the initial shape of parliamentary arithmetic in the new Parliament. **The politics:** The vote produced an unusual cross-party configuration. Rather than the Conservatives leading opposition, the Liberal Democrats provided the largest bloc of Aye votes with 64, joined by the SNP (9), Greens (4), Plaid Cymru (4), the DUP (4), the SDLP (2), and a handful of independents and Labour rebels (6). Strikingly, the Conservative Party recorded zero Aye votes and only one No vote, with 115 MPs absent, suggesting the party abstained en masse. This early vote illustrated that in the new Parliament, opposition to Labour would come from multiple directions simultaneously, with smaller parties willing to combine against the government even on motions that might otherwise be associated with Conservative priorities.
Voting Aye meant
Support the Conservative amendment criticising or seeking to alter the direction of the Labour government's stated legislative programme
Voting No meant
Back the Labour government's King's Speech and reject the Conservative alternative priorities
466 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 183 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
6
321
35
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
1
115
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
64
0
8
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
39
3
Independent
6
2
6
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
9
0
—
Reform UK
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2
0
—
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
—
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
—
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
1
0
—
Criticized Labour's cancellation of Rwanda asylum scheme, effective amnesty for illegal arrivals, and poor diplomatic handling; defended Conservative policing and migration records while accusing Labour of abandoning tough rhetoric.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (4,153 words) →
Outlined three-pillar Home Office strategy (crime/policing, borders/asylum, security); criticized Conservative legacy on police numbers, visa system mismanagement, and Rwanda scheme's wasteful £700m spend with minimal results.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,485 words) →
Welcomed Home Secretary's openness to cross-party working; supported scrapping Rwanda scheme and called for proper community policing, court backlog reduction, and better immigration system for economy and genuine refugees.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,767 words) →
Acknowledged election defeat; defended Rwanda scheme as part of deterrent strategy and criticized its abandonment; emphasized need for international development spending and returns agreements as long-term solutions.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,006 words) →
Focused on poverty, inequality, and disabled people's rights; welcomed King's Speech measures on child poverty, social security, and living standards as remedy to 14 years of Conservative cuts.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,228 words) →
Emphasized impact of Conservative cuts on schools, housing, health, and children's mental health; welcomed Labour's legislative programme for child poverty, education, and young people's wellbeing.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,213 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0