King's Speech (Motion for an Address): Amendment (k)
85
Ayes
—
382
Noes
Defeated · Government won
180 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** On 23 July 2024, the House of Commons voted on Amendment (k) to the King's Speech, a motion put forward as part of the traditional opposition debate on the government's legislative programme. The amendment was defeated by 382 votes to 85. The King's Speech debate is the formal parliamentary occasion on which MPs debate and can challenge the government's plans for the parliamentary session, and opposition amendments are the standard mechanism for doing so. **Why it matters:** The vote concerned issues of constitution and democracy, with the amendment representing a Conservative-aligned critique of the incoming Labour government's plans in this area. The defeat of the amendment means that Labour's legislative programme on constitutional and democratic matters faces no immediate parliamentary obstacle. With such a large majority voting against the amendment, the government retains a strong mandate to proceed with its agenda as set out in the King's Speech. **The politics:** Notably, the Conservative Party does not appear in the voting record at all, suggesting low or absent turnout from the Official Opposition. The 85 votes in favour came overwhelmingly from the Liberal Democrats, who provided 66 of the Ayes, alongside smaller contributions from independents, Plaid Cymru, the Green Party, Reform UK, and the Social Democratic and Labour Party. Labour and its Co-operative Party allies voted unanimously against. The Democratic Unionist Party and Traditional Unionist Voice sided with the government in opposition. This unusual cross-party shape, with non-Conservative parties providing most of the Aye votes, reflects the particular dynamics of the 2024 parliament following Labour's landslide general election victory.
Voting Aye meant
Support Amendment (k) to the King's Speech, backing the specific alternative priorities or criticisms it proposed against the government's agenda
Voting No meant
Reject Amendment (k), backing the government's stated legislative programme as set out in the King's Speech
467 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 180 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
333
29
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
66
0
6
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
39
3
Independent
7
3
4
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
3
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2
0
—
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
—
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
—
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
—
Your Party
0
1
—
Criticized Labour's cancellation of Rwanda asylum scheme, effective amnesty for illegal arrivals, and poor diplomatic handling; defended Conservative policing and migration records while accusing Labour of abandoning tough rhetoric.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (4,153 words) →
Outlined three-pillar Home Office strategy (crime/policing, borders/asylum, security); criticized Conservative legacy on police numbers, visa system mismanagement, and Rwanda scheme's wasteful £700m spend with minimal results.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,485 words) →
Welcomed Home Secretary's openness to cross-party working; supported scrapping Rwanda scheme and called for proper community policing, court backlog reduction, and better immigration system for economy and genuine refugees.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,767 words) →
Acknowledged election defeat; defended Rwanda scheme as part of deterrent strategy and criticized its abandonment; emphasized need for international development spending and returns agreements as long-term solutions.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,006 words) →
Focused on poverty, inequality, and disabled people's rights; welcomed King's Speech measures on child poverty, social security, and living standards as remedy to 14 years of Conservative cuts.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,228 words) →
Emphasized impact of Conservative cuts on schools, housing, health, and children's mental health; welcomed Labour's legislative programme for child poverty, education, and young people's wellbeing.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,213 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0