The local authorityCouncil · county · england · 1 of 21 councils (county)

Worcestershire County Council.

Council with no overall control county. £538m net revenue. 112 wards across 6 parliamentary constituencies. Comprises 6 districts: Bromsgrove, Malvern Hills, Redditch, Worcester, Wychavon, Wyre Forest.

Typecounty
Seats0 councillors · 112 wards
Net revenue · 2025-26
£538m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
/0
Westminster
6
constituencies overlap · 2 MP parties
Dispatch
8 Jun 2026

Council chamber, 2-party MP geography.

Worcestershire County Council is a county with no overall control. Net revenue is £538m for 2025-26. It covers 112 wards spanning 6 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 2 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§Districts.6 districts · Band D £2,201–£2,327
DistrictBand D billCounty tax sourcedWards
Bromsgrove£2,302.72£61.7m30
Malvern Hills£2,280.82£55.7m18
Redditch£2,289.33£42.5m9
Worcester£2,233.93£53.6m16
Wychavon£2,200.98£87.2m27
Wyre Forest£2,327.49£56.8m12

Band D is the full household bill (county + district + police + fire + parish). “County tax sourced” is Worcestershire County Council’s own precept (£1615.71/yr at Band D) collected through each district’s tax base — totalling £354.7m.

§ 01Composition.0 seats

Who sits in the chamber.

Councillors — the people.

Councillor data not yet ingested for Worcestershire County Council.

§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

66%
Council tax
£354.7m · median 66%
27%
Central grants
£147.7m · median 27%
7%
Business rates
£35.1m · median 7%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (county) median: 66% council tax, 27% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,616

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 20 other councils (county)

How does Worcestershire County Council split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (county)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education40.7% of net spend · cohort median 40%
10 of 21+1% vs median
Adult Social Care29.1% of net spend · cohort median 31%
15 of 21-7% vs median
Children's Services14.6% of net spend · cohort median 14%
7 of 21+6% vs median
Public Health3.8% of net spend · cohort median 3%
2 of 21+14% vs median
Waste & Recycling3.8% of net spend · cohort median 3%
7 of 21+10% vs median
Highways & Transport3.4% of net spend · cohort median 4%
16 of 21-15% vs median
Corporate & Central3.1% of net spend · cohort median 1%
1 of 21+122% vs median
Culture & Leisure1.2% of net spend · cohort median 1%
3 of 21+28% vs median
Planning & Economic Development0.3% of net spend · cohort median 0%
13 of 21-3% vs median
Housing & Homelessness0.0% of net spend · cohort median 0%
16 of 18-100% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.21,703 payments · £272.7m gross · 3 Dec 202531 Mar 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
MERCIA WASTE£18.93m6.9%22
RINGWAY INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES£14.71m5.4%695
ACORN CARE & EDUCATION LTD£9.84m3.6%60
COLAS LIMITED£4.41m1.6%28
BROMSGROVE SCHOOLS SPV LTD£4.12m1.5%56
BEECHKEYS LIMITED T/A AURORA GROUP£3.22m1.2%7
DIAMOND BUS LIMITED£2.91m1.1%126
DIMENSIONS PERSONALISED SUPPORT£2.84m1.0%95
SUNFIELD CHILDRENS HOMES LTD£2.82m1.0%12
BARRIE BOOKKEEPING & PAYROLL SOLUTIONS L£2.63m1.0%60

By service area · top supplier

ServiceTop supplierPaid
Planning And EconomicMERCIA WASTE£13.82m
Corporate And CentralRINGWAY INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES£7.16m
Childrens ServicesACORN CARE & EDUCATION LTD£4.78m
Adult Social CareBROMSGROVE SCHOOLS SPV LTD£3.00m
Public HealthCRANSTOUN SERVICES LTD£1.05m
§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.112 wards split across 6 parliamentary seats

Worcestershire County Council’s territory crosses 6 Westminster constituencies, with 2 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Bromsgrove3027% Bradley ThomasCon
West Worcestershire2321% Harriett BaldwinCon
Droitwich and Evesham1917% Nigel HuddlestonCon
Worcester1614% Tom CollinsLab
Redditch1211% Chris BlooreLab
Wyre Forest1211% Mark GarnierCon
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 4 Con and 2 Lab MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a -controlled county — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 20 other councils (county)
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
21,703 payments · 3 Dec 202531 Mar 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level