The local authorityCouncil · Unitary · England · 1 of 63 unitary authorities

Thurrock.

Reform UK-controlled unitary. £178m net revenue. 20 wards across 0 parliamentary constituencies.

TypeUnitary
Seats49 councillors · 20 wards
Last election7 May 2026
Websitethurrock.gov.uk
Net revenue · 2025-26
£178m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,145
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
45/49
Reform UK 92%
Westminster
0
constituencies overlap
Dispatch
14 Jul 2026

Reform UK chamber, opposed area.

Thurrock is a unitary controlled by Reform UK (45 of 49 seats). Net revenue is £178m for 2025-26. It covers 20 wards spanning 0 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.49 seats · last contested 7 May 2026

Who sits in the chamber.

Ref 45Con 2Lab 2

Reform UK 92% · last contested 7 May 2026

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Aiden PrinceRefAveley2026
Chris IrvineRefAveley2026
George MonkRefAveley2026
Bogdan EnacheRefBelhus2026
Linda BensonRefBelhus2026
Tom KellyRefBelhus2026
Jack Thomas Wilfred FullerRefChadwell St Mary2026
James William MacKintoshRefChadwell St Mary2026
Matt LakeRefChadwell St Mary2026
Peggy DaviesRefChafford Hundred East2026
Stephen DaviesRefChafford Hundred East2026
Oscar EllisRefChafford Hundred West2026
Showing 12 of 49·All 49 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

54%
Council tax
£96.5m · median 59%
33%
Central grants
£58.9m · median 30%
13%
Business rates
£22.8m · median 11%

Revenue mix is close to the unitary authorities median: 54% council tax, 33% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,797
County / upper-tier£0
Police£260
Fire & rescue£88
GLA precept£0
Total Band-D£2,145

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 62 other unitary authorities

How does Thurrock split its revenue across services, compared with peer unitary authoritie-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education31.9% of net spend · cohort median 36%
41 of 61-11% vs median
Children's Services25.4% of net spend · cohort median 15%
3 of 61+72% vs median
Adult Social Care19.6% of net spend · cohort median 27%
61 of 61-28% vs median
Waste & Recycling8.7% of net spend · cohort median 6%
2 of 61+51% vs median
Public Health5.2% of net spend · cohort median 4%
12 of 61+43% vs median
Housing & Homelessness3.2% of net spend · cohort median 2%
13 of 61+66% vs median
Highways & Transport2.6% of net spend · cohort median 3%
33 of 61-2% vs median
Corporate & Central2.4% of net spend · cohort median 3%
39 of 61-15% vs median
Culture & Leisure2.1% of net spend · cohort median 2%
33 of 61-5% vs median
Planning & Economic Development-1.1% of net spend · cohort median 1%
61 of 61-176% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.6,437 payments · £282.1m gross · 3 Dec 20251 Mar 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
PUBLIC WORKS LOAN BOARD£146.34m51.9%5
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES & LOCAL GOVERNMENT£17.24m6.1%14
THURROCK COUNCIL£9.89m3.5%97
LONDON BOROUGH OF BARKING & DAGENHAM£9.38m3.3%5
INLAND REVENUE£8.30m2.9%26
ESSEX COUNTY COUNCIL£7.34m2.6%27
POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSIONER FOR ESSEX£5.09m1.8%5
MEARS LTD£4.78m1.7%154
REDACTED£4.15m1.5%1,161
NHS MID AND SOUTH ESSEX ICB£3.78m1.3%6

By service area · top supplier

ServiceTop supplierPaid
Corporate And CentralPUBLIC WORKS LOAN BOARD£143.00m
Housing And HomelessnessMEARS LTD£4.70m
Adult Social CareNHS MID AND SOUTH ESSEX ICB£3.78m
Planning And EconomicMATRIX SCM LIMITED£3.52m
Childrens ServicesREDACTED£2.70m
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 62 other unitary authorities
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
6,437 payments · 3 Dec 20251 Mar 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level