The local authorityCouncil · county · england · 1 of 21 councils (county)

Oxfordshire County Council.

Council with no overall control county. £710m net revenue. 112 wards across 7 parliamentary constituencies. Comprises 5 districts: Cherwell, Oxford, South Oxfordshire, Vale of White Horse, West Oxfordshire.

Typecounty
Seats0 councillors · 112 wards
Net revenue · 2025-26
£710m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
/0
Westminster
7
constituencies overlap · 2 MP parties
Dispatch
8 Jun 2026

Council chamber, 2-party MP geography.

Oxfordshire County Council is a county with no overall control. Net revenue is £710m for 2025-26. It covers 112 wards spanning 7 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 2 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§Districts.5 districts · Band D £2,444–£2,557
DistrictBand D billCounty tax sourcedWards
Cherwell£2,463.87£114.5m16
Oxford£2,557.13£88.5m24
South Oxfordshire£2,474.44£122.2m21
Vale of White Horse£2,456.82£113.8m24
West Oxfordshire£2,443.88£93.2m27

Band D is the full household bill (county + district + police + fire + parish). “County tax sourced” is Oxfordshire County Council’s own precept (£1911.40/yr at Band D) collected through each district’s tax base — totalling £532.4m.

§ 01Composition.0 seats

Who sits in the chamber.

Councillors — the people.

Councillor data not yet ingested for Oxfordshire County Council.

§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

75%
Council tax
£532.4m · median 66%
19%
Central grants
£136.5m · median 27%
6%
Business rates
£40.9m · median 7%

This is a high-council-tax councils (county): 75% of revenue from council tax, above the cohort median (66%).

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,911

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.11 buckets · vs 20 other councils (county)

How does Oxfordshire County Council split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (county)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education38.0% of net spend · cohort median 40%
13 of 21-6% vs median
Adult Social Care30.4% of net spend · cohort median 31%
12 of 21-3% vs median
Children's Services14.4% of net spend · cohort median 14%
8 of 21+5% vs median
Highways & Transport4.4% of net spend · cohort median 4%
6 of 21+10% vs median
Public Health3.4% of net spend · cohort median 3%
10 of 21+1% vs median
Waste & Recycling3.1% of net spend · cohort median 3%
14 of 21-9% vs median
Protective Services2.8% of net spend · cohort median 3%
5 of 90% vs median
Corporate & Central1.6% of net spend · cohort median 1%
9 of 21+16% vs median
Culture & Leisure1.3% of net spend · cohort median 1%
1 of 21+39% vs median
Planning & Economic Development0.3% of net spend · cohort median 0%
11 of 210% vs median
Housing & Homelessness0.3% of net spend · cohort median 0%
9 of 18+2% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.13,847 payments · £120.4m gross · 3 Dec 202531 Dec 2025

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED£9.93m8.3%197
HM REVENUE & CUSTOMS ONLY£7.79m6.5%1
OXFORDSHIRE CC PENSION FUND£4.76m4.0%3
REDACTED DATA£4.09m3.4%1,187
ACTIVATE LEARNING£3.32m2.8%359
HAYS SPECIALIST RECRUITMENT LTD£2.86m2.4%5
ORDERS OF ST JOHN£2.73m2.3%523
ABINGDON & WITNEY COLLEGE£2.24m1.9%405
CHILWORTH HOUSE SCHOOL£2.01m1.7%60
VIRIDOR OXFORDSHIRE LIMITED£1.74m1.4%1

By service area · top supplier

ServiceTop supplierPaid
Corporate And CentralACTIVATE LEARNING£3.29m
Adult Social CareORDERS OF ST JOHN£2.42m
EducationOXON TRANSPORT SERVICES LTD£0.34m
Highways And TransportPULHAM & SONS (COACHES) LTD£0.09m
§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.112 wards split across 7 parliamentary seats

Oxfordshire County Council’s territory crosses 7 Westminster constituencies, with 2 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Witney2119% Charlie MaynardLD
Oxford East1715% Anneliese DoddsInd
Oxford West and Abingdon1715% Layla MoranLD
Didcot and Wantage1614% Olly GloverLD
Henley and Thame1513% Freddie van MierloLD
Banbury1312% Sean WoodcockLab
Bicester and Woodstock1312% Calum MillerLD
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 5 LD and 1 Lab MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a -controlled county — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 20 other councils (county)
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
13,847 payments · 3 Dec 202531 Dec 2025
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level