The local authorityCouncil · Unitary · England · 1 of 63 unitary authorities

Derby.

Labour Party-controlled unitary. £288m net revenue. 18 wards across 3 parliamentary constituencies.

TypeUnitary
Seats51 councillors · 18 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Net revenue · 2025-26
£288m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,196
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
23/51
Labour Party 45%
Westminster
3
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
29 Jun 2026

Labour Party chamber, Labour Party MPs.

Derby is a unitary controlled by Labour Party (23 of 51 seats). Net revenue is £288m for 2025-26. It covers 18 wards spanning 3 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.51 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Lab 23Con 15LD 4Ind 3Reform Derby 3Reform Derby and Reform UK 3

Labour Party 45% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Carmel Mary Evelyn AshbyLabAbbey2023
Paul Thomas HezelgraveLabAbbey2023
Sue BonserLabAbbey2023
Ged PotterConAllestree2023
Kieran Alexander Morgan-McGeehanConAllestree2023
Steve HassallConAllestree2023
Alan GravesIndAlvaston North2023
John EvansIndAlvaston North2023
Kirk Lewis KusIndAlvaston North2023
Alan LindseyIndAlvaston South2023
Stephen William FowkeIndAlvaston South2023
Timothy ProsserIndAlvaston South2023
Showing 12 of 51·All 51 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

46%
Council tax
£132.3m · median 59%
40%
Central grants
£115.9m · median 30%
14%
Business rates
£39.8m · median 11%

This is a grant-heavy unitary authoritie: 46% from council tax vs the cohort median of 59%.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,809
County / upper-tier£0
Police£294
Fire & rescue£93
GLA precept£0
Total Band-D£2,196

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 62 other unitary authorities

How does Derby split its revenue across services, compared with peer unitary authoritie-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education37.5% of net spend · cohort median 36%
23 of 61+5% vs median
Adult Social Care21.8% of net spend · cohort median 27%
57 of 61-20% vs median
Children's Services18.5% of net spend · cohort median 15%
16 of 61+25% vs median
Waste & Recycling5.6% of net spend · cohort median 6%
33 of 61-3% vs median
Public Health5.2% of net spend · cohort median 4%
13 of 61+42% vs median
Highways & Transport3.6% of net spend · cohort median 3%
16 of 61+37% vs median
Corporate & Central2.9% of net spend · cohort median 3%
31 of 610% vs median
Planning & Economic Development2.0% of net spend · cohort median 1%
16 of 61+48% vs median
Housing & Homelessness1.6% of net spend · cohort median 2%
38 of 61-17% vs median
Culture & Leisure1.3% of net spend · cohort median 2%
54 of 61-40% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.9,944 payments · £34.3m gross · 4 Dec 202522 Dec 2025

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
REDACTED£2.13m6.2%1,614
DERBYSHIRE HEALTHCARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST£0.95m2.8%2
DCG£0.72m2.1%2
MERCER BUILDING SOLUTIONS LIMITED£0.70m2.0%6
RESPECT COLLABORATION TRUST KINGSMEAD SCHOOL£0.65m1.9%130
SWANTON CARE & COMMUNITY£0.60m1.7%361
DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL£0.60m1.7%7
ROYAL SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF DERBY£0.58m1.7%4
DERBY CITY BSF LIMITED£0.55m1.6%1
DERBY SCHOOL SOLUTIONS LIMITED£0.52m1.5%1

By service area · top supplier

ServiceTop supplierPaid
Adult Social CareREDACTED£1.15m
Childrens ServicesREDACTED£0.91m
Planning And EconomicDERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL£0.57m
Waste And RecyclingMERCER BUILDING SOLUTIONS LIMITED£0.49m
Corporate And CentralTOTALENERGIES GAS AND POWER LIMITED.£0.34m
Housing And HomelessnessREDACTED£0.01m
§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.18 wards split across 3 parliamentary seats
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Derby South950% Baggy ShankerInd
Derby North528% Catherine AtkinsonLab
Mid Derbyshire422% Jonathan DaviesLab
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 62 other unitary authorities
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
9,944 payments · 4 Dec 202522 Dec 2025
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level