The local authorityCouncil · Unitary · England · 1 of 63 unitary authorities

Central Bedfordshire.

Independent-controlled unitary. £288m net revenue. 31 wards across 5 parliamentary constituencies.

TypeUnitary
Seats63 councillors · 31 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Websitecentralbedfordshire.gov.uk
Net revenue · 2025-26
£288m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,394
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
27/63
Independent 43%
Westminster
5
constituencies overlap · 2 MP parties
Dispatch
29 Jun 2026

Independent chamber, 2-party MP geography.

Central Bedfordshire is a unitary controlled by Independent (27 of 63 seats). Net revenue is £288m for 2025-26. It covers 31 wards spanning 5 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 2 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§ 01Composition.63 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Ind 27Con 20LD 10Lab 5Green 1

Independent 43% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Gary SummerfieldIndAmpthill2023
Mark Andrew SmithIndAmpthill2023
Susan Heather ClinchGrnAmpthill2023
Jodie ChilleryIndArlesey & Fairfield2023
Nick AndrewsLabArlesey & Fairfield2023
John Michael BakerIndAspley & Woburn2023
Anna FrenchIndBarton-le-Clay & Silsoe2023
Liz ChildsIndBarton-le-Clay & Silsoe2023
Gareth TranterIndBiggleswade East2023
Grant Graham FageConBiggleswade East2023
Hayley WhitakerIndBiggleswade West2023
Paul HowIndBiggleswade West2023
Showing 12 of 63·All 63 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

74%
Council tax
£212.8m · median 59%
20%
Central grants
£56.8m · median 30%
6%
Business rates
£18.2m · median 11%

This is a high-council-tax unitary authoritie: 74% of revenue from council tax, above the cohort median (59%).

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,840
County / upper-tier£0
Police£279
Fire & rescue£118
GLA precept£0
Parish average£158
Total Band-D£2,394

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 62 other unitary authorities

How does Central Bedfordshire split its revenue across services, compared with peer unitary authoritie-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education42.3% of net spend · cohort median 36%
7 of 61+18% vs median
Adult Social Care29.2% of net spend · cohort median 27%
19 of 61+7% vs median
Children's Services12.8% of net spend · cohort median 15%
44 of 61-13% vs median
Waste & Recycling4.9% of net spend · cohort median 6%
49 of 61-14% vs median
Corporate & Central3.0% of net spend · cohort median 3%
25 of 61+6% vs median
Public Health2.7% of net spend · cohort median 4%
44 of 61-26% vs median
Highways & Transport1.9% of net spend · cohort median 3%
46 of 61-27% vs median
Housing & Homelessness1.6% of net spend · cohort median 2%
37 of 61-15% vs median
Culture & Leisure1.0% of net spend · cohort median 2%
56 of 61-53% vs median
Planning & Economic Development0.4% of net spend · cohort median 1%
55 of 61-69% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.31 wards split across 5 parliamentary seats

Central Bedfordshire’s territory crosses 5 Westminster constituencies, with 2 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard1135% Alex MayerLab
Mid Bedfordshire929% Blake StephensonCon
North Bedfordshire516% Richard FullerCon
Hitchin413% Alistair StrathernLab
Luton South and South Bedfordshire26% Rachel HopkinsLab
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 3 Lab and 2 Con MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a Independent-controlled unitary — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 62 other unitary authorities
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
Not yet ingested for Central Bedfordshire
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level