Committee publication · Report · 10 February 2026 · HC 1472

8th Report - Railways Bill

From: Transport Committee

Inquiry: Railways Bill

Government response deadline: 10 April 2026

Summary

The Transport Committee's eighth report examines the Railways Bill (presented November 2025), which restructures UK railways by establishing Great British Railways as a unified body overseeing track and train operations. The Committee supports the Bill's core purpose but identifies significant gaps: key documents remain unpublished, accountability mechanisms are unclear, the Passengers' Council lacks enforcement powers, and tensions exist between Secretary of State oversight and GBR's intended independence. The Committee recommends amendments to strengthen governance, clarify duties, and enhance passenger protections.

Key findings

  • The Bill represents only ~30% of required processes and documents; critical items including the Long Term Rail Strategy, licence, business plan, and charging scheme remain unpublished, hindering scrutiny and industry confidence.
  • Secretary of State powers of direction over GBR are too broadly drafted, risking micromanagement of day-to-day operations despite Government intent to use them sparingly; clause 7 should require directions be 'necessary and proportionate'.
  • Aligned duties on GBR, ORR, and the Secretary of State lack clarity on weighting; statutory guidance is needed, with explicit assurance that cost considerations do not outweigh all other duties.
  • Passengers' Council lacks direct enforcement power, relying on ORR discretion, creating delays and complexity; ORR should be required to act on referrals with very limited exceptions.
  • Bill omits statutory passenger growth target despite including freight growth target; passenger journeys are fundamental to GBR's purpose and Government decarbonisation aims, and inclusion would incentivise commercially-minded improvements.

Recommendations

  • Publish a comprehensive list with target dates of decisions, key documents, and planned consultations leading to GBR establishment and first year of operation, including workforce consultation milestones.
  • Amend clause 7 to require that use of Secretary of State's power of direction must be necessary and proportionate, preserving enforcement ability while preventing micromanagement.
  • Require the Long Term Rail Strategy be laid before Parliament, with substantively amended versions also laid, to prevent it becoming a series of short-term strategies.
  • Publish at least an initial draft of GBR's licence before Report Stage in the House of Commons to enable parliamentary scrutiny.
  • Issue and publish statutory guidance on how GBR should weigh competing duties in clause 18, ensuring cost is considered proportionately and does not outweigh all other considerations.
  • Amend the Bill to require Passengers' Council sets standards (not merely grants power to do so), and explicitly state it has discretion to set standards on matters beyond passenger information, compensation, complaints, and accessibility.
  • Require ORR to take enforcement action on Passengers' Council referrals (with very limited exceptions) rather than applying discretion, and require a pre-appointment hearing for the Council's Chair before Parliament.
  • Amend the Bill to include a duty on Secretary of State to set a passenger journey growth target similar to the freight growth target in clause 17.
  • Amend clause 18 duties to require improvement in accessibility for disabled users, and require at least two Passengers' Council members have lived experience of travelling as disabled persons.
  • Clarify the relationship between new Bill duties and existing Equality Act 2010 duties.
  • Broaden freight operators' appeal grounds for access decisions to reflect Government freight promotion outcomes.
  • Make Mayoral Strategic Authorities statutory consultees on the Long Term Rail Strategy, require GBR to weight their Local Transport Plans, and investigate MSA/LTA roles in GBR's regional business units.

Tone

Critical

Topics

railwaysgovernance-accountabilitypassenger-rightsaccessibilitypublic-ownership

Key actors

Ruth Cadbury, Heidi Alexander, Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill, John Larkinson, Ben Plowden, Richard Goodman, Lucy Ryan, Fiona Hyslop

Notable line

… the Bill gives a partial picture of the framework for a new regime under Great British Railways. The Bill is designed to last a long time and is accompanied by various additional documentation.

Key Quotes

… the Bill will sweep away the fragmentation and dysfunction that have plagued the railway for too long …
Secretary of State Heidi Alexander · describing purpose of Railways Bill
… a commercially agile public body, given responsibility over the entire railway to make economies of scale, joining track and train for an integrated railway, but with devolved and responsible management.
Rail Minister Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill · describing nature of GBR
… the Bill accounted for only around 30 per cent of the processes and documents that would need to be in place to make GBR an effective organisation.
Ben Plowden, Campaign for Better Transport · on scope of legislative framework
… too many directions could prevent GBR being empowered to fulfil the "guiding mind" role.
John Larkinson, Chief Executive of Office of Rail and Road · on Secretary of State power of direction
Q14 10 Q17 9 of direction would allow the Secretary of State to frequently change course, leading to uncertainty for rail freight investors.
Rail Freight Group · on risks of direction power
… the Secretary of State's powers of direction required "strong safeguards" to prevent "political intervention from becoming routine" and "excessive ministerial involvement" in the day to day operations of GBR.
Alstom · on governance concerns
The duty is vague, subjective and unenforceable. It does not guarantee improvements, define measurable outcomes, or create accountability for delivering meaningful accessibility change.
Transport for All · on passenger interest duty regarding disabled persons
The Passengers' Council must be given adequate powers for its role. For example, should the group identify a significant issue and suggest an improvement, what power will there be to ensure changes happen? What redress will be given if no change is made?
Whizz Kidz · on Passengers' Council enforcement powers
View original document →

Source · parliament.uk record ↗

8th Report - Railways Bill | Beyond The Vote | Beyond The Vote