Committee publication · Correspondence · 8 July 2026

Correspondence from Minister Kinnock on Local Authorities and ICBs

From: Health and Social Care Committee

Summary

Minister Stephen Kinnock writes to explain the government's policy rationale for removing joint local authority nomination of ICB board members in favour of strategic authority representation. He defends the change as enabling clearer organisational roles, supporting place-level partnership through health and wellbeing boards, and allowing local flexibility rather than prescriptive national frameworks. He addresses concerns about London's distinctive governance landscape.

Key findings

  • Government removes joint local authority nomination to ICB boards; strategic authorities will nominate instead, reflecting ICBs' focus on strategic healthcare commissioning across larger geographies.
  • Health and wellbeing boards designated as central mechanism for place-level NHS-local authority partnership; local authorities retain statutory responsibility for adult social care commissioning.
  • Strategic authority representation on ICB boards intended to enable sectoral alignment between health, care, housing, and public health without requiring strategic authorities to commission healthcare directly.
  • NHS contributes minimum £2.4 billion per year to adult social care through Better Care Fund; ICBs have exceptions for continuing healthcare and NHS-funded nursing care.
  • Government emphasises non-statutory partnerships and local flexibility over prescriptive national governance frameworks; London and other distinct regions encouraged to supplement statutory arrangements with locally agreed models.

Tone

Procedural

Topics

health-social-care-integrationgovernancenhs-commissioninglocal-government

Key actors

Stephen Kinnock MP, Layla Moran MP, Ben Coleman MP, Integrated Care Boards (ICBs), Strategic authorities, Health and Wellbeing Boards, Local authorities

Notable line

The statutory partnerships and governance arrangements are best thought of as a floor not a ceiling, recognising the necessity of the ICB board itself being small enough to be effective.

Key Quotes

Much of the 10 Year Health Plan depends on effective partnerships to secure better outcomes for people who require both health and social care support; to improve prevention and population health; and to make a reality of the shift of care from hospital to community.
Stephen Kinnock MP · Setting out the strategic importance of NHS-local government partnership
If everyone specialises in everything, little will get done in practice.
Stephen Kinnock MP · Justifying the principle of giving organisations clear roles and accountabilities
Much of the day-to-day alignment and integration in the system between the NHS and local government happens at a more local level than the ICB and the ICB board …
Stephen Kinnock MP · Explaining the rationale for prioritising place-level partnership over ICB board representation
It is wrong, therefore, to suggest that strategic authorities need to have a direct responsibility for delivering or commissioning healthcare or social care in order to contribute to the ICB Board.
Stephen Kinnock MP · Defending strategic authority board participation without direct service commissioning duties
It is precisely because previous arrangements have sought to answer the 'London question' (or indeed the 'Stoke question' or any number of others) with an over -prescriptive national framework that has inevitably suited some places more than others that local voices and choices have been crowded out.
Stephen Kinnock MP · Justifying move away from prescriptive governance to local flexibility
View original document →

Source · parliament.uk record ↗

Correspondence from Minister Kinnock on Local Authorities and ICBs | Beyond The Vote | Beyond The Vote