Committee publication · Report · 24 April 2026 · HC 680

7th Report – Resetting the relationship with fishing communities

From: Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee

Inquiry: Fisheries and the marine environment

Government response deadline: 24 June 2026

Summary

This Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee report examines the government's £360 million Fishing and Coastal Growth Fund, a 12-year initiative announced in May 2025. While welcoming the Fund's establishment, the committee identifies significant concerns: the funding rationale and duration lack clear explanation, allocations via the Barnett formula ignore the concentrated geography of UK fishing, stakeholder engagement has excluded major ports like Brixham and Cornwall, and communication on regulatory changes has been poor. The report emphasizes rebuilding trust with fishing communities, addressing spatial competition from offshore wind and marine protection, and establishing formal forums for industry input.

Key findings

  • The government has not clearly explained why £360 million over 12 years is the right funding level or duration for the Fishing and Coastal Growth Fund, despite the timeframe aligning with UK-EU reciprocal access arrangements.
  • Devolved allocations using the Barnett formula are misaligned with the actual distribution of the fishing industry—Scotland has 40% of the UK fleet but receives only 8% of the Fund (£28m vs England's £304m).
  • First-year funding for England (£22.6m) is modest and not front-loaded; stakeholders call for multi-year funding packages to enable sustained project planning across the 12-year period.
  • Consultation on the Fund has excluded significant stakeholders including Brixham (England's largest fishing port) and Cornwall's fishing communities; engagement must be expanded and continuous from year two onward.
  • Poor communication on regulatory changes (UK-EU technical measures with June 2026 implementation) left industry and even the MMO uncertain about deadlines and obligations; the MMO ceased routine publication of enforcement data, eroding regulatory transparency and trust.

Recommendations

  • The government should provide analysis supporting the £360 million funding level, 12-year duration, and spending profile, plus rationale for a new scheme versus building on existing ones; define measurable long-term outcomes for growth, resilience, and competitiveness.
  • Priority should be given to active fishing community-driven projects throughout the Fund's 12 years, embedded in any expanded delivery model with clear, measurable criteria; year-two priorities should include fleet modernisation reducing carbon emissions and place-based fishing advisory services.
  • The government should set out year-by-year allocations for England over the next four years and clarify how funding will flow to devolved administrations (annual, front-loaded, or single payment).
  • Industry engagement should continue consistently from year two onward, expanded to include additional fisheries groups and Cornwall representatives; government should specify whether a single new delivery system or two-tier model will be used and proportion allocated to each priority area.
  • The UK Government should work collaboratively with devolved administrations on Fund design and allocation for year two to ensure consistency and fairness across the sector; Seafish should support a coherent UK-wide approach.
  • Defra officials working on fisheries policy, funding schemes, and regulatory design should undertake regular, in-person engagement at ports with active fishing vessels, mirroring the department's civil service placement programme on farms.
  • Defra should establish a UK-wide network of Regional Fisheries Management Forums (fishers, marine scientists, environmental organisations) meeting at least three times yearly with published minutes; forums should review draft technical measures and policies, with Defra required to respond formally to written recommendations.
  • Defra should provide a clear written account of engagement with the fishing industry after the December 2025 UK-EU fisheries consultations, including dates, stakeholders, communication of new technical measures, implementation timelines, and flexibility on the June 1, 2026 deadline.
  • The MMO must include inspection rates and enforcement outcomes in annual reports beginning with 2025–26 and retrospectively publish data for the previous three years to enable trend assessment and scrutiny.
  • The government should urgently develop a comprehensive UK-wide Sea Use Framework collaboratively, placing fishing and coastal communities at its heart with strong cross-government leadership, to manage competing marine demands (offshore wind, marine protection, fishing) fairly.

Tone

Critical

Topics

fisheries-policycoastal-developmentpublic-financeregulatory-transparencymarine-spatial-planning

Key actors

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), Marine Management Organisation (MMO), National Federation of Fishermen's Organisations (NFFO), The Crown Estate, Seafish, Dame Angela Eagle (Fisheries Minister), Steve Reed (former Defra Secretary)

Notable line

Trust between fishers and the government has been badly eroded over successive administrations. Rebuilding that trust is essential if the sector is to realise its economic and social potential.

Key Quotes

We welcome the establishment of the Fishing and Coastal Growth Fund and recognise the opportunity it offers to strengthen fishing and coastal communities that have felt overlooked for too long.
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee · Opening position on the Fund announcement
While the government has now recognised the link between the fishing industry and coastal communities, it has not clearly explained the rationale for committing £360 million over 12 years to the new fund.
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee · Criticism of lack of justification for funding parameters
"consolation" that has been put in place as an alternative means of supporting the sector's long term economic future …
National Federation of Fishermen's Organisations · Characterizing the Fund's timing alongside the 12-year reciprocal access deal
Applying the Barnett formula produces outcomes that feel detached from the lived reality of fishing communities, where the sector is concentrated in specific nations and regions rather than shared evenly across the UK.
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee · Critique of devolved allocations methodology
It is not credible for any devolved administration to demand devolution of a scheme and then to complain about the financial consequences of them being given what they asked for.
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee · Response to Scottish Government's devolution request and subsequent criticism of allocation
… the Marine Management Organisation has a particular presence at every port for every landing of every catch.
Fisheries Minister (Dame Angela Eagle) · Response to concerns about government engagement with fishing industry
Communication and engagement with the fishing industry on the outcomes of the annual UK–EU consultations for 2026 regarding changes to technical measures were inadequate …
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee · Assessment of December 2025 UK-EU fisheries agreement communication failures
Those who are regulated need clear visibility of how that regulation is being enforced, so it is concerning that the MMO no longer routinely publishes its enforcement data in its annual reports …
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee · Concern over enforcement transparency cessation
View original document →

Source · parliament.uk record ↗

7th Report – Resetting the relationship with fishing communities | Beyond The Vote | Beyond The Vote