Committee publication · Report · 17 July 2026 · HC 87

11th Report - Unlocking land for housing

From: Public Accounts Committee

Inquiry: Unlocking land for housing

Government response deadline: 17 September 2026

Summary

The Public Accounts Committee scrutinises the Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government's £21 billion National Housing Delivery Fund (NHDF) launched March 2026 to unlock land for housing. The Committee finds the Department has not set measurable success criteria or home-delivery targets for the NHDF, lacks a strategic project-selection approach, and failed to establish external evaluation at launch. Legacy programmes delivered only 57,671 of 713,000 expected homes by December 2025, with tracking gaps acknowledged.

Key findings

  • The Department launched the £21 billion NHDF without specifying success criteria, measurable targets for homes to be delivered, or how much funding would support unlocking land versus other interventions, preventing robust accountability for this substantial public investment.
  • Of 713,000 homes expected from £10.5 billion legacy unlocking programmes (2016–17 onwards), only 57,671 had been delivered by December 2025; 24,400 were identified through retrospective analysis, indicating initial tracking failures.
  • The Department and Homes England did not initially track homes from some legacy programmes and are using retrospective geospatial analysis, with particular difficulty attributing homes to infrastructure-only investments (e.g. M5 junction improvements); methodology lacks external validation.
  • The NHDF operates on a reactive, demand-led project-by-project basis rather than strategic selection, risking an unbalanced portfolio across locations; the Department declined to set numerical delivery targets, arguing flexibility is needed to balance multiple objectives.
  • External evaluation of the NHDF was not in place at launch in March 2026; the Department gave itself until mid-2027 to complete scoping, risking loss of early learning opportunities and data collection gaps.

Recommendations

  • Department should set out success criteria for each NHDF objective (housing supply, economic growth, place-making, quality, financial return), with milestones and key risks; report six-monthly on homes completed and forecast on unlocked land.
  • Department should confirm NHDF business case finalisation and provide explanation of key issues and risks identified.
  • Department and Homes England should set out methodology for tracking homes on legacy programmes, evaluate that methodology, and report final numbers of completed homes within twelve months.
  • By year-end, Department and Homes England should jointly explain how NHDF approach will adapt to ongoing local government reorganisation (unitary authorities, Mayoral Strategic Authorities) and Homes England's new target operating model.
  • Department and Homes England should articulate how NHDF will: (a) select and balance projects across locations with Strategic Place Partnerships to maximise impact; (b) decide investment type (grants/loans/equity) to achieve greatest impact and value for money.
  • Department should update on progress letting contracts for NHDF evaluation and write setting out in detail how evaluation will work once finalised.

Tone

Critical

Topics

public-financehousing-supplyland-developmentaccountabilitylocal-government

Key actors

Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, Homes England, Public Accounts Committee, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, Sarah Healey, Amy Rees, HM Treasury, Comptroller and Auditor General

Notable line

Without clear measurable success criteria to assess outcomes, the Department cannot be held to account for how it spends this substantial public investment.

Key Quotes

Without clear measurable success criteria to assess outcomes, the Department cannot be held to account for how it spends this substantial public investment.
Public Accounts Committee · On NHDF accountability and performance measurement
The Department launched the NHDF without a pipeline of projects suggesting its approach to creating a portfolio of projects is reactive and demand led rather than strategically planned.
Public Accounts Committee · On strategic approach to project selection
… it wants the flexibility to balance its objectives and not focus entirely on the number of homes delivered
Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government (evidence) · On reason for not setting specific home-delivery targets
There is a lack of transparency about the Department's approach to tracking the number of homes built on land unlocked in these more complicated cases.
Public Accounts Committee · On retrospective tracking of legacy programme outcomes
It is important the Department concludes this work at the earliest opportunity so it knows which data is needed to conduct quality evaluations and can put in plans to collect it.
Public Accounts Committee · On external evaluation delays and early learning
… it has completed retrospective tracking for 90% of land projects and 30% of infrastructure projects and expects to take 12 months to complete this analysis
Homes England (evidence) · On retrospective tracking progress for legacy programmes
View original document →

Source · parliament.uk record ↗

11th Report - Unlocking land for housing | Beyond The Vote | Beyond The Vote