Committee publication · Report · 11 December 2025 · HC 755

1st Report - Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures

From: Modernisation Committee

Inquiry: Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures

Government response deadline: 11 February 2026

Summary

The Modernisation Committee's first report examines accessibility of the House of Commons for disabled MPs, staff, and visitors. It finds the 900-year-old Palace of Westminster creates unacceptable barriers: only 12% step-free access, inaccessible procedures, and poor organisational culture around disability. The committee recommends embedding accessibility as a strategic priority, establishing external advisory groups, improving physical infrastructure, modernising voting systems, and enhancing communication clarity.

Key findings

  • The Palace of Westminster offers step-free access to only 12% of the building; heavy doors, unmarked steps, glass doors, and poor lighting create daily barriers for disabled MPs and staff.
  • Disabled MPs report the voting process, seating arrangements, and accessing key spaces (Library, Press Gallery, Table Clerks' dais) are physically inaccessible and require problematic workarounds.
  • Parliamentary culture implicitly expects disabled people to adapt to the institution rather than vice versa; lack of proactive support and inconsistent application of reasonable adjustments persist.
  • The House Administration has begun action via a new Accessibility Group, Members Accessibility Group, and Workplace Adjustment Passports, but these improvements are overdue and accountability mechanisms are absent.
  • Accessibility must be embedded as a strategic organisational priority with mandatory disability awareness training for line managers, annual accessibility audit progress reports, and external expert scrutiny.

Recommendations

  • Establish an External Accessibility Advisory Group including organisations representing disabled people, tasked with reviewing feedback on parliamentary services, to publish annual reports to the House of Commons Commission.
  • Publish annual summaries of progress against accessibility audit recommendations in the Strategic Estates team's Annual Business Plan to ensure transparency and accountability.
  • Advertise on intranet and annunciator screens when accessible entrances/exits are out of service, with clear signposting of alternatives.
  • Implement text message option for reporting urgent security or safety concerns, communicated via annual essentials training.
  • Move deferred divisions from paper-based system to electronic pass readers to improve voting accessibility.
  • Discuss with the Clerk of the House and whips reconfiguring the Reasons Room to allow some MPs to vote there rather than walking through Lobbies.
  • Consider a 'Reasonable Adjustments card' scheme to reserve seats in the chamber for disabled MPs requiring specific positions.
  • Expand glossary pages and accessible guides; produce more parliamentary documents in Easy Read and other accessible formats; consider bringing accessible format production in-house.
  • Review placement of speakers and screens in the public gallery to meet disabled visitors' needs; explore accessible subtitling for debates.
  • Make accessibility a strategic priority in the House Administration's strategy document and organisational values; implement mandatory disability awareness training for line managers.
  • Run a communications campaign raising awareness of accessibility as an organisational priority.
  • Ensure Restoration and Renewal Programme prioritises accessibility in any chosen option.

Tone

Critical

Topics

accessibilitydisability-rightsparliamentary-proceduresworkplace-accommodationbuilding-infrastructure

Key actors

Modernisation Committee, Marianne Cwynarski (Director General, House Commons Administration), Tom Goldsmith (Clerk of the House), Margaret McKinnon (Director, Members and Members Staff Services Team), Marsha De Cordova MP, Marie Tidball MP, Restoration and Renewal Delivery Authority

Notable line

The negative impact this has on their ability to contribute equally alongside their colleagues is not acceptable.

Key Quotes

In PCH [Portcullis House], for example, there are glass doors everywhere. Somebody who is visually impaired is not really able to see where the handles or the doors are.
Marsha De Cordova MP · describing barriers in Portcullis House for visually impaired users
I struggle to use the turnstile doors to enter the building. I always have to ask somebody to open the door for me, so just getting into the building is a challenge.
Marie Tidball MP · describing difficulty accessing the building entrance
You just feel you are doing a battle with the building every day.
Baroness Brinton · describing the day-to-day experience of navigating inaccessible accessible toilets
Parliament implicitly expects a person with disabilities or impairments to adapt to its premises and procedures, rather than the institution adapting to them.
House of Commons Trade Union Side · summarising the experience of disabled staff members
If we have a building in which MPs and colleagues cannot do their jobs because of basic problems, that sends a very bad message to everyone who watches this place.
Tom Goldsmith · explaining the legitimacy implications of inaccessible parliamentary infrastructure
I don't want your help. I want to be independent. Why should I have to ask for your help?
Robert Halfon · illustrating the cultural attitude problem where disabled people must request help rather than having barriers removed
When we visit Parliament, it is good to have a bit more when we enter the actual entrance, more of a welcome—to have someone there to say, "Oh, hi, welcome to Parliament.
Ismail Kaji, Mencap · advocating for a more welcoming approach at parliamentary security
View original document →

Source · parliament.uk record ↗

1st Report - Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures | Beyond The Vote | Beyond The Vote