Division · No. 486Wednesday, 15 April 2026Commons Schools

Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 41B

254
Ayes
144
Noes
Passed · Government won
249 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 15 April 2026, MPs voted on whether to reject Lords Amendment 41B to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, a change that had been made by the House of Lords to alter the government's original version of the legislation. The government's motion to disagree with the Lords passed by 254 votes to 144, meaning the Commons restored its earlier position and sent the bill back to the upper chamber. **Why it matters:** The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill covers a broad range of policy relating to children's welfare and the school system in England. By voting to reject Lords Amendment 41B, the government succeeded in removing a modification the Lords had inserted into the bill, restoring the Commons' preferred version of that particular clause. The practical effect depends on the specific content of the amendment, but the outcome means the policy direction the government sought to embed in this area of children's and schools legislation will proceed without the Lords' change. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 254 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted supported the government's position, while 83 Conservatives, 52 Liberal Democrats, 4 Greens, and several smaller-party and independent MPs voted to retain the Lords' amendment. There were no Labour rebels. This division was one of several held on the same day relating to Lords amendments to the same bill, with similarly consistent government majorities across each vote, reflecting a sustained effort by the government to reassert the Commons' position across multiple disputed clauses.

Voting Aye meant
Support the government's decision to reject Lords Amendment 41B and restore the Commons' original position on this clause of the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill
Voting No meant
Support retaining the Lords' amendment 41B, opposing the government's attempt to override the change made by the upper chamber
§ 01Who voted how.398 voting members · 249 absent
Aye255No146DID NOT VOTE · 249

398 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 249 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
226
0
136
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
83
33
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
52
20
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
28
0
14
Independent
1
5
7
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
8
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
1
4
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Olivia BaileyOpposedReading West and Mid Berkshire
Defending Government's consultation approach on social media and phones rather than accepting Lords amendments; committed to statutory guidance review and six-month reporting requirementLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,372 words)
Laura TrottOpposedSevenoaks
Strongly pushing for immediate statutory ban on social media for under-16s and mobile phones in schools, citing US court rulings and bereaved parents' testimonyConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,695 words)
Munira WilsonOpposedTwickenham
Supporting Lords amendments on phones and sibling contact; criticising Government's opt-in powers and lack of binding timeline; calling for film-style age ratings and statutory phone banLiberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (1,739 words)
Graham StuartOpposedBeverley and Holderness
Advocating for immediate statutory bans on smartphones in schools and social media for under-16s; arguing Government is making excuses and lacking courageConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,683 words)
Helen HayesSupportiveDulwich and West Norwood
Supporting Government's consultation while acknowledging genuine stakeholder disagreements; defending need for detailed evidence-gathering through Education CommitteeLabour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (408 words)
Monica HardingOpposedEsher and Walton
Describing public health crisis from social media; demanding immediate action rather than consultation; citing 2,600 constituent emails demanding bansConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,137 words)
Emma LewellSupportiveSouth Shields
Celebrating Government amendment 17B on sibling contact in care system after decade-long campaign; thanking colleagues and charitiesLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (545 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0