Division · No. 485Wednesday, 15 April 2026Commons Schools

Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: motion relating to Lords Amendment 38

256
Ayes
150
Noes
Passed · Government won
240 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 15 April 2026, the House of Commons voted to reject Lords Amendment 38 to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, restoring the original text passed by the Commons. The motion passed by 256 votes to 150, with the government securing a majority of 106. This was one of several votes held on the same day as part of the "ping-pong" process, in which the Commons and Lords exchange amendments until both chambers agree on a final text. **Why it matters:** The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill covers a broad range of policy areas relating to child welfare and school reform in England. By voting to reject Amendment 38, MPs chose to restore the government's preferred version of this portion of the legislation. The practical effect depends on the specific content of that amendment, but the vote is part of a wider pattern on 15 April in which the government successfully reversed multiple Lords changes to the Bill, advancing its original legislative agenda on children's services and schools. **The politics:** The vote split almost entirely along party lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs provided 249 of the 256 Aye votes, alongside small contributions from the Green Party, the SNP, and two independents. All 86 Conservative MPs who voted, all 53 Liberal Democrats, all four Plaid Cymru members, and smaller unionist parties voted No, backing the Lords' version. Three Labour MPs broke with their party to vote No. The result is consistent with three other Commons victories for the government on the same bill the same day, each overturning Lords amendments with similar margins.

Voting Aye meant
Support the government's position of rejecting Lords Amendment 38, restoring the original Commons text of the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill
Voting No meant
Support retaining Lords Amendment 38, backing the change made by the House of Lords to the Bill
§ 01Who voted how.406 voting members · 240 absent
Aye258No152DID NOT VOTE · 240

406 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 240 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
220
3
139
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
86
30
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
53
19
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
29
0
13
Independent
2
4
7
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
3
0
6
Reform UK
0
0
8
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
1
4
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
1
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
0
0
1
§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Olivia BaileyOpposedReading West and Mid Berkshire
Defending Government's consultation approach on social media and phones rather than accepting Lords amendments; committed to statutory guidance review and six-month reporting requirementLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,372 words)
Laura TrottOpposedSevenoaks
Strongly pushing for immediate statutory ban on social media for under-16s and mobile phones in schools, citing US court rulings and bereaved parents' testimonyConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,695 words)
Munira WilsonOpposedTwickenham
Supporting Lords amendments on phones and sibling contact; criticising Government's opt-in powers and lack of binding timeline; calling for film-style age ratings and statutory phone banLiberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (1,739 words)
Graham StuartOpposedBeverley and Holderness
Advocating for immediate statutory bans on smartphones in schools and social media for under-16s; arguing Government is making excuses and lacking courageConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,683 words)
Helen HayesSupportiveDulwich and West Norwood
Supporting Government's consultation while acknowledging genuine stakeholder disagreements; defending need for detailed evidence-gathering through Education CommitteeLabour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (408 words)
Monica HardingOpposedEsher and Walton
Describing public health crisis from social media; demanding immediate action rather than consultation; citing 2,600 constituent emails demanding bansConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,137 words)
Emma LewellSupportiveSouth Shields
Celebrating Government amendment 17B on sibling contact in care system after decade-long campaign; thanking colleagues and charitiesLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (545 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0