Division · No. 421Wednesday, 28 January 2026Commons Health

Draft Medical Devices (Fees Amendment) Regulations 2026

294
Ayes
108
Noes
Passed · Government won
247 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 28 January 2026 to approve the Draft Medical Devices (Fees Amendment) Regulations 2026, passing the measure by 294 votes to 108. The regulations change the fees that pharmaceutical and medical device companies pay to the regulator when seeking approval or licensing for medical devices in the UK. As a deferred division -- a procedural arrangement where MPs vote at a scheduled later time rather than immediately after debate -- the result was announced by the Deputy Speaker. The fee changes affect the costs businesses face when bringing medical devices to market in the UK. Higher or restructured regulatory fees can influence how quickly new devices reach patients, how attractive the UK market is for manufacturers, and how well-resourced the regulator is to assess safety and efficacy. The vote advances the government's proposed framework for funding medical device regulation, with supporters arguing it ensures the regulator has adequate resources and opponents suggesting the new fee structure places excessive or poorly designed burdens on industry. The vote divided largely along party lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs provided almost all of the 294 ayes, while the Conservatives supplied 91 of the 108 noes, joined by all six Reform UK MPs present, all five Democratic Unionist Party members, and representatives from the Traditional Unionist Voice and Ulster Unionist Party. Three Labour or Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against their own government's position, representing a small but notable dissent. The vote sits within a broader period of parliamentary activity on health regulation, following closely on divisions the previous day concerning the Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill.

Voting Aye meant
Support updated medical device fee regulations, accepting the government's revised approach that attempts to balance regulatory funding with protecting SMEs in the life sciences industry
Voting No meant
Oppose the fee regulations, citing concerns about unpredictability of costs for businesses and the cumulative regulatory burden on medical device manufacturers
§ 01Who voted how.402 voting members · 247 absent
Aye294No108DID NOT VOTE · 247

402 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 247 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
260
2
100
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
91
25
Liberal Democrats
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
27
1
14
Independent
5
1
7
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped No
0
6
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
5
Green Party of England and Wales
1
0
3
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
Your Party
0
0
1
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0