Budget Resolution No. 51: Inheritance tax (pension interests)
364
Ayes
—
167
Noes
Passed · Government won
116 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened**: On 2 December 2025, the House of Commons voted on Budget Resolution No. 51, which would bring pension interests within the scope of inheritance tax. The resolution passed by 364 votes to 167, with the government's position securing a comfortable majority. **Why it matters**: The resolution approves a Budget measure that closes a long-standing arrangement whereby pension pots could be passed on to beneficiaries without attracting inheritance tax. Under the existing rules, defined contribution pension funds held at the time of death fall outside a person's taxable estate, meaning they can be inherited free of inheritance tax regardless of their value. This resolution signals Parliament's intent to end that position, bringing pension interests into line with other assets for inheritance tax purposes. The change is expected to affect higher-value estates where pension funds have been used as a vehicle for wealth transfer rather than retirement income. **The politics**: The vote divided broadly along government and opposition lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour, joined by the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and three independents. The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, and the Democratic Unionist Party all voted against, with no Conservative or Liberal Democrat MP supporting the measure. The Liberal Democrats' opposition is notable given that party's general positioning on wealth taxation, and it places them alongside the Conservatives and Reform UK in resistance to this specific change. The vote sits within a wider pattern of parliamentary activity on pension and employer contribution taxation seen in related divisions in early 2026, where government majorities consistently defeated opposition amendments seeking to alter or reverse the approach.
Voting Aye meant
Support bringing pension funds into the inheritance tax regime, closing a tax-planning loophole that allowed wealthy individuals to pass on pension wealth free of inheritance tax
Voting No meant
Oppose extending inheritance tax to pension interests, arguing it penalises savers, disrupts retirement planning, and represents an unfair double taxation on pension savings
531 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 116 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
305
0
57
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
89
27
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
59
13
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
39
0
3
Independent
3
6
4
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
8
0
1
Reform UKWhipped No
0
8
—
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
5
—
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
—
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
—
Your Party
1
0
—
Budget is morally necessary investment to lift children from poverty, rebuild NHS as public service, and tackle public health crisis; lifting two-child cap is paid for by tax avoidance crackdowns and gambling tax.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,668 words) →
Budget is a tax grab on working people without real reform plan; NHS waiting lists falling far too slowly; government failed to resolve strikes and has no credible social care strategy.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,779 words) →
Budget treads water on NHS; unclear how medicine price increases and reorganisation costs will be paid; calls for EU customs union and better GP access rather than tax rises.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (2,898 words) →
Budget is progressive and fair; lifting two-child cap will reduce child poverty by 500,000; tax reforms on wealthy and investment in employment support are sound policy.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (917 words) →
NHS frontline staff at St Thomas' hospital deserve recognition for managing through strikes; government must prevent further strike action.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (89 words) →
Budget lacks growth measures and imposes stealth taxes on working people; freeze on income tax thresholds and EV tax burden rural constituencies disproportionately.Independent · Voted no · Read full speech (714 words) →
Strongly defends two-child cap removal as moral imperative; criticizes Opposition for opposing child poverty relief despite UK being wealthy nation.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (543 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0