Division · No. 371Tuesday, 2 December 2025Commons Taxation

Budget Resolution No. 5: Income tax (savings rate for future years)

369
Ayes
166
Noes
Passed · Government won
117 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 2 December 2025, the House of Commons voted on Budget Resolution No. 5, which sets income tax rates on savings income for future years. The resolution passed by 369 votes to 166, with the government's position carrying comfortably. **Why it matters:** Budget resolutions are the formal mechanism by which Parliament approves the tax measures announced in the Chancellor's Budget statement, giving them legal effect. This particular resolution locks in the income tax rates that apply to savings income, such as interest earned on bank accounts and bonds, for future tax years. It forms part of the government's broader fiscal framework and determines how much tax savers pay on returns from their savings. **The politics:** The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 309 Labour MPs and 39 Labour and Co-operative members voted in favour, while Conservatives (89), Liberal Democrats (60), Reform UK (8), the Democratic Unionist Party (5), and Traditional Unionist Voice (1) all voted against. Plaid Cymru (4) and the Green Party (3) backed the government, and a majority of independents did the same. There were no rebels on the Labour benches. The result reflects the government's substantial Commons majority and mirrors the broader pattern of opposition to the Budget's tax measures seen in related votes on employer National Insurance contributions and industrial financial assistance in the weeks that followed.

Voting Aye meant
Support approving the government's proposed savings income tax rate as set out in the Budget
Voting No meant
Oppose the government's proposed savings income tax rate, either as too high or as part of broader opposition to the Budget
§ 01Who voted how.535 voting members · 117 absent
Aye365No167DID NOT VOTE · 117

535 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 117 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
309
0
53
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
89
27
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
60
12
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
39
0
3
Independent
8
3
2
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped No
0
8
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
5
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
Your Party
1
0
§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Wes StreetingSupportiveIlford North
Budget is morally necessary investment to lift children from poverty, rebuild NHS as public service, and tackle public health crisis; lifting two-child cap is paid for by tax avoidance crackdowns and gambling tax.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,668 words)
Stuart AndrewOpposedDaventry
Budget is a tax grab on working people without real reform plan; NHS waiting lists falling far too slowly; government failed to resolve strikes and has no credible social care strategy.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,779 words)
Helen MorganNeutralNorth Shropshire
Budget treads water on NHS; unclear how medicine price increases and reorganisation costs will be paid; calls for EU customs union and better GP access rather than tax rises.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (2,898 words)
Debbie AbrahamsSupportiveOldham East and Saddleworth
Budget is progressive and fair; lifting two-child cap will reduce child poverty by 500,000; tax reforms on wealthy and investment in employment support are sound policy.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (917 words)
Florence EshalomiSupportiveVauxhall and Camberwell Green
NHS frontline staff at St Thomas' hospital deserve recognition for managing through strikes; government must prevent further strike action.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (89 words)
Adam DanceOpposedYeovil
Budget lacks growth measures and imposes stealth taxes on working people; freeze on income tax thresholds and EV tax burden rural constituencies disproportionately.Independent · Voted no · Read full speech (714 words)
Ian LaverySupportiveBlyth and Ashington
Strongly defends two-child cap removal as moral imperative; criticizes Opposition for opposing child poverty relief despite UK being wealthy nation.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (543 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0