Division · No. 290Wednesday, 10 September 2025Commons Buses

Bus Services (No.2) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 23

158
Ayes
297
Noes
Defeated · Government won
196 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on Amendment 23 to the Bus Services (No.2) Bill at report stage (the stage at which MPs debate and vote on changes to a bill before it proceeds to the House of Lords). The amendment was defeated by 297 votes to 158. The result means the government's version of the bill continues without this modification. **Why it matters:** The Bus Services (No.2) Bill sets out how bus services across England will be regulated, with a central focus on expanding local authority powers to franchise and control routes. Amendment 23 proposed a change to those provisions, supported by opposition parties who argued the bill needed strengthening or redirecting in some way. Its defeat means the government's original approach to bus service reform remains intact, affecting how millions of passengers across England will experience local bus networks in the coming years. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. Labour MPs overwhelmingly voted no, with 265 Labour and 27 Labour and Co-operative members supporting the government. Conservatives supplied the bulk of the aye votes with 88 in favour, joined by all 60 Liberal Democrats who voted, 3 Green MPs, 4 Reform UK members, and 1 Democratic Unionist Party MP. Only one Labour MP crossed the floor to vote aye. This pattern mirrors other divisions on the same bill that day, in which similar coalitions formed and were defeated by comparable margins, suggesting a coordinated opposition effort to reshape the bill that the government saw off at each turn.

Voting Aye meant
Support the proposed amendment to the Bus Services (No.2) Bill, likely seeking to change or add to the government's approach to bus service regulation or franchising
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, backing the government's original approach to reforming bus services as set out in the Bill
§ 01Who voted how.455 voting members · 196 absent
Aye159No294DID NOT VOTE · 196

455 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 196 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
1
265
96
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
88
0
28
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
60
0
12
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
27
15
Independent
1
2
10
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
1
0
§ 02From the debate.3 principal speakers
Simon LightwoodSupportiveWakefield and Rothwell
Government supports Bill's bus reform measures to grow patronage, extend £3 fare cap to 2027, provide franchising powers, and publish guidance on floating bus stops and zero-emission vehicles within three months of Royal Assent.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,778 words)
Ms Nusrat GhaniQuestioningSussex Weald
Opposition proposes numerous new clauses including £2 fare caps, free travel for under-22s and carers, reviews of funding cuts, minimum service standards, and enhanced accountability measures for bus operators and authorities.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (14,271 words)
Jerome MayhewNeutralBroadland and Fakenham
Shadow Minister begins to outline opposition's perspective on the Bill, noting it will be an interesting debate with significant scope for discussion.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,090 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0