Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage: Amendment 174
194
Ayes
—
335
Noes
Defeated · Government won
116 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** On 17 June 2025, the House of Commons voted on Amendment 174 to the Crime and Policing Bill during its Report Stage. The amendment was defeated by 335 votes to 194. Report Stage is the phase of parliamentary scrutiny in which the full House of Commons considers proposed changes to a bill that has already passed through committee examination. **Why it matters:** The Crime and Policing Bill is a wide-ranging piece of legislation touching on police powers, criminal justice, surveillance, and protections for victims. Amendment 174 represented an attempt by opposition parties and some independent members to modify the bill's provisions, broadly from a civil liberties perspective. The government's successful defeat of the amendment means the bill continues on its original course without the proposed changes, preserving the government's preferred approach to crime and policing reform. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along government versus opposition lines. All 329 Labour and Labour Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment. Support for the amendment came from the Conservatives (101 votes), the Liberal Democrats (68 votes), Reform UK (8 votes), seven independents, Plaid Cymru (4 votes), the Greens (4 votes), and the Democratic Unionist Party (4 votes), while the Social Democratic and Labour Party joined the government with 2 votes against. The breadth of opposition support, spanning from Conservatives to Reform UK to the Greens, illustrates an unusual cross-ideological coalition united in challenging this particular aspect of the government's bill.
Voting Aye meant
Support tougher action on fly-tipping and littering through additional legislative measures in the Crime and Policing Bill
Voting No meant
Oppose this specific opposition amendment on fly-tipping, likely arguing existing provisions or separate legislation are sufficient or that the amendment is unnecessary
529 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 116 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
301
61
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
101
0
15
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
68
0
4
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
28
14
Independent
7
3
3
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
8
0
—
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
2
—
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
—
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
0
1
—
Government minister defending the Bill's measures to tackle crime, antisocial behaviour, and violence against women and girls; arguing the Bill provides essential powers to address gaps in law and protect vulnerable people including emergency workers and children.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (6,557 words) →
Shadow minister welcoming much of the Bill but arguing for stronger measures including increasing knife crime sentencing to 14 years, implementing driving licence penalty points for fly-tippers, and strengthening respect orders with enhanced sanctions.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,618 words) →
Backbencher supporting mandatory reporting but arguing the Bill does not go far enough; specifically advocating for criminal sanctions for non-compliance, extending the duty to all positions of trust as defined in Sexual Offences Act 2003, and broadening triggers to include recognised indicators of abuse.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,957 words) →
Warning against treating the Crime Bill as a 'Christmas tree' for unrelated amendments, particularly those on abortion law, which risk fracturing cross-party consensus and require separate, fuller debate.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (532 words) →
Raising concerns about police funding adequacy, particularly questioning whether national insurance cost increases are properly funded and whether neighbourhood policing numbers represent genuine increases or redeployments.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,375 words) →
Supporting the Bill's measures on neighbourhood policing, begging, and homelessness exploitation; praising new police officers in constituency and defending government record on police staffing.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (208 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0