Division · No. 234Wednesday, 18 June 2025Commons Crime & Policing

Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 7

102
Ayes
390
Noes
Defeated · Government won
156 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 18 June 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 7, a proposed addition to the Crime and Policing Bill during its Report Stage (the stage at which the full House scrutinises and amends a bill after committee). The clause was defeated heavily, with 102 voting in favour and 390 voting against. **Why it matters:** The vote concerned a proposed change to the Crime and Policing Bill, a significant piece of legislation shaping policing powers and criminal justice in England and Wales. New Clause 7 represented an alternative approach to elements of the bill, broadly associated with police reform and civil liberties considerations. Its defeat means the government's version of the bill proceeds without this addition, preserving the existing framework the government has drafted around law and order policy. **The politics:** The division fell largely along party lines, with Conservatives (91 votes) and Reform UK (7 votes) forming the core of the 102 Ayes, along with a small number of independents and the Democratic Unionist Party. Labour, the Liberal Democrats, and all other parties voted No, reflecting a cross-opposition alliance behind the government. There were no Labour or Liberal Democrat rebels. The result, with the government's position defeating the amendment by a margin of nearly four to one, illustrates the current government's commanding Commons majority and its ability to resist opposition amendments at Report Stage.

Voting Aye meant
Support reforming or restricting police recording of non-crime hate incidents, arguing the current system threatens free expression
Voting No meant
Oppose this change, either defending the existing NCHI framework or preferring to address the issue through other means
§ 01Who voted how.492 voting members · 156 absent
Aye104No389DID NOT VOTE · 156

492 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 156 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
282
80
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
91
0
25
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
64
8
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
28
14
Independent
3
6
4
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Tonia AntoniazziSupportiveGower
Proposed New Clause 2 to criminalise commercial sexual exploitation by third parties, including those profiting from prostitution and operating websites with adverts.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,884 words)
Judith CumminsSupportiveBradford South
Introduced New Clause 3 to make it an offence to pay for sex, and New Clause 4 to decriminalise victims of commercial sexual exploitation by repealing loitering/soliciting offences.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (30,584 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0