Division · No. 189Wednesday, 7 May 2025Commons Digital and Technology

Data (Use and Access) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 19

160
Ayes
294
Noes
Defeated · Government won
195 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 7 May 2025 on New Clause 19 to the Data (Use and Access) Bill at Report Stage. The clause proposed significant additional privacy protections and restrictions on the government's data sharing powers. The motion was defeated by 294 votes to 160, meaning the clause will not be added to the Bill. The vote concerned how broadly the government can share and use data across public services as part of its digital transformation agenda. New Clause 19 would have imposed stronger limitations on those powers, with supporters arguing it was necessary to protect citizens' privacy. Its defeat means the Bill proceeds without those extra restrictions, leaving the government's data sharing framework largely intact and clearing the path for wider use of public sector data in modernising digital services. The division split sharply along party lines. All Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the clause, providing the bulk of the 294 Noes. Supporting the clause were 90 Conservatives, 55 Liberal Democrats, 5 Reform UK MPs, 3 Greens, and a small number of independents and smaller parties. There were no notable cross-party rebels within the governing party. The vote reflects a recurring tension in the Bill's passage, with opposition parties consistently pressing for stronger privacy safeguards while the government resisted constraints on its data modernisation plans.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring the government to conduct a review into raising the age at which children can consent to social media data processing without parental approval from 13 to 16, before any legislative change is made
Voting No meant
Oppose this review-first approach, either because the government prefers its own separate copyright/AI reporting mechanism (New Clause 17) or because others (like Lib Dems) wanted immediate implementation rather than further delay
§ 01Who voted how.454 voting members · 195 absent
Aye161No293DID NOT VOTE · 195

454 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 195 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
265
97
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
55
0
17
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
26
16
Independent
6
1
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
5
0
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Chris BryantOpposedRhondda and Ogmore
Government will not legislate piecemeal on AI copyright but will conduct full consultation review and establish taskforce on technical solutions; existing copyright law is robust and does not need clarification.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (7,168 words)
Dr Ben SpencerSupportiveRunnymede and Weybridge
New clauses 20 and 21 needed for certainty on copyright protection and sex data accuracy; Government should formally restate that copyright law applies to AI models and correct public authority data collection.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,841 words)
Victoria CollinsSupportiveHarpenden and Berkhamsted
Tech companies should lead opt-in systems for creatives rather than expecting creatives to opt-out; technical solutions must be implemented immediately, not delayed.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,180 words)
Pete WishartSupportivePerth and Kinross-shire
Generative AI is actively ingesting creative content now; Parliament must act immediately with amendments rather than wait for reports and future legislation.SNP · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,235 words)
Stella CreasySupportiveWalthamstow
Government must make clear commitment that copyright protections benefiting creatives remain unchanged; existing law should be preserved rather than weakened.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,330 words)
Alice MacdonaldQuestioningNorwich North
Reports required within 12 months may be too slow given urgency; Government should expedite timelines for reassurance while accepting need for consultation.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (126 words)
Samantha NiblettQuestioningSouth Derbyshire
Sex data recording must consider impact on trans people and not make them feel forgotten; digital verification services must be inclusive.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,118 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0