Division · No. 188Wednesday, 7 May 2025Commons Digital and Technology

Data (Use and Access) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 2

88
Ayes
287
Noes
Defeated · Government won
272 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 7 May 2025 on New Clause 2 to the Data (Use and Access) Bill during its Report Stage in the House of Commons. The clause proposed additional safeguards and oversight mechanisms governing how public authorities can access and use personal data. The motion was defeated by 287 votes to 88, with the government's position prevailing comfortably. The vote determined whether the bill would include stricter limits on government data sharing powers. Supporters of the new clause argued it would protect citizens from excessive or opaque use of their personal information by public bodies. Opponents, including the government, maintained that such restrictions would impede the bill's core purpose of enabling better use of data to improve public services and drive digital transformation of the state. The bill as a whole seeks to modernise data governance in the United Kingdom following the country's departure from the European Union's regulatory framework. The division exposed a clear party-political divide, with Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voting overwhelmingly against the clause, providing the bulk of the 287 noes. The Liberal Democrats were the most unified force in favour, contributing 56 of the 88 aye votes. The Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and most participating Reform UK members also voted aye, forming a broad but ultimately insufficient cross-party opposition coalition. Only two Labour MPs broke with their party to support the clause. Notably, Conservative MPs were largely absent, with just six voting aye and none voting no, suggesting the party did not formally whip its members to oppose or support the clause at this stage. The bill continued through Parliament and into Lords-Commons exchanges, with subsequent divisions in May and June 2025 showing the government repeatedly defeating Lords amendments on related data-use questions.

Voting Aye meant
Support raising the minimum age for children's social media data consent from 13 to 16, giving stronger protections to teenagers online
Voting No meant
Oppose this specific amendment as piecemeal legislation, preferring a more comprehensive and joined-up approach to child online safety and data rights
§ 01Who voted how.375 voting members · 272 absent
Aye90No287DID NOT VOTE · 272

375 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 272 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
2
262
98
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
6
0
110
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
56
0
16
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
24
18
Independent
6
1
6
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
6
0
3
Reform UK
2
0
6
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
1
0
§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Chris BryantOpposedRhondda and Ogmore
Government will not legislate piecemeal on AI copyright but will conduct full consultation review and establish taskforce on technical solutions; existing copyright law is robust and does not need clarification.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (7,168 words)
Dr Ben SpencerSupportiveRunnymede and Weybridge
New clauses 20 and 21 needed for certainty on copyright protection and sex data accuracy; Government should formally restate that copyright law applies to AI models and correct public authority data collection.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (3,841 words)
Victoria CollinsSupportiveHarpenden and Berkhamsted
Tech companies should lead opt-in systems for creatives rather than expecting creatives to opt-out; technical solutions must be implemented immediately, not delayed.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,180 words)
Pete WishartSupportivePerth and Kinross-shire
Generative AI is actively ingesting creative content now; Parliament must act immediately with amendments rather than wait for reports and future legislation.SNP · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,235 words)
Stella CreasySupportiveWalthamstow
Government must make clear commitment that copyright protections benefiting creatives remain unchanged; existing law should be preserved rather than weakened.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,330 words)
Alice MacdonaldQuestioningNorwich North
Reports required within 12 months may be too slow given urgency; Government should expedite timelines for reassurance while accepting need for consultation.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (126 words)
Samantha NiblettQuestioningSouth Derbyshire
Sex data recording must consider impact on trans people and not make them feel forgotten; digital verification services must be inclusive.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,118 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0