Division · No. 155Wednesday, 26 March 2025Commons Health

Tobacco and Vapes Bill: Third Reading

366
Ayes
41
Noes
Passed · Government won
244 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on 26 March 2025 to pass the Tobacco and Vapes Bill at Third Reading, the final stage before the Bill moves to the House of Lords. The vote passed by 366 ayes to 41 noes, a majority of 325. Third Reading is the last opportunity for MPs to approve or reject a bill in its entirety before it leaves the Commons. **Why it matters:** The Bill introduces what the Government describes as a smokefree generation by progressively raising the legal age for purchasing tobacco products. A person turning 16 in 2025 will never legally be able to buy cigarettes, as the minimum age rises by one year with each passing year. The legislation also tightens regulation of vaping and other nicotine products, restricts advertising of those products, and strengthens enforcement powers for trading standards. Supporters argue it is the most significant public health intervention since the ban on smoking in public places in 2007, with the potential to prevent tens of thousands of deaths linked to smoking, which currently causes over 80,000 deaths per year in England. **The politics:** The vote produced a large cross-party majority, with all 288 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs present voting in favour, joined by 38 Liberal Democrats and representatives of Plaid Cymru, the Green Party, the DUP and the Traditional Unionist Voice. Conservative MPs were the most divided: 24 voted in favour while 30 voted against, with 62 absent. Reform UK's four attending MPs all voted no. The Bill builds on legislation that the previous Conservative government had itself introduced, which created an unusual dynamic in which some Conservatives actively supported the Bill while others opposed it on grounds of personal liberty or concerns about the illegal tobacco market.

Voting Aye meant
Support passing the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, creating a smokefree generation through progressive age-of-sale restrictions on tobacco and tighter regulation of vapes
Voting No meant
Oppose the Bill, potentially on grounds of personal freedom, concerns about enforcement, or government overreach into lifestyle choices
§ 01Who voted how.407 voting members · 244 absent
Aye361No43DID NOT VOTE · 244

407 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 244 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
259
0
103
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
24
30
62
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
38
6
28
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
29
0
13
Independent
1
2
10
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped No
0
4
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
1
3
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
1
0
§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Ashley DaltonSupportiveWest Lancashire
Defends the Bill as watershed public health legislation that will save lives by ending tobacco sales to future generations, strengthen vaping restrictions for children, and support adult smokers via stop-smoking services and vape-as-quit-aid schemes.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,874 words)
Dr Caroline JohnsonOpposedSleaford and North Hykeham
Supports tobacco control but opposes the Bill's broad powers allowing the Secretary of State to designate smoke-free places without consultation or justified public health grounds; advocates for restricted powers, mandatory pre-implementation licensing consultation, and annual reports on illegal tobacco markets.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,907 words)
Sir Ashley FoxOpposedBridgwater
Warns that the generational smoking ban will inevitably increase the illegal tobacco market, a highly regrettable unintended consequence that requires monitoring and enforcement action.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (47 words)
Sir John HayesNeutralSouth Holland and The Deepings
Emphasises that illegal tobacco sales are linked to serious organised crime and money laundering, often by foreign-owned shops, and urges stronger support for trading standards and police enforcement.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,565 words)
Jack RankinOpposedWindsor
Argues the black market already exists significantly (44% drop in duty-paid cigarettes despite only 0.5% reduction in smoking) and the Bill increases that risk, so evidence-gathering via amendment 19 is essential.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,627 words)
Mr Joshua ReynoldsQuestioningMaidenhead
Seeks confirmation that fixed penalty notice fines will be retained by local authorities for public health spending to offset enforcement costs.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (65 words)
Preet Kaur GillSupportiveBirmingham Edgbaston
Welcomes the Bill as world-leading public health legislation that will reduce smoking prevalence and protect NHS resources from being overwhelmed by preventable tobacco-related illness.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,625 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0