Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1
344
Ayes
—
172
Noes
Passed · Government won
129 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on 19 November 2024 to reject an amendment made by the House of Lords to the Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill. The motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1 passed by 344 votes to 172. This means the Commons chose to restore the government's original version of the bill, removing a modification the unelected upper chamber had introduced. **Why it matters:** The Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill is the legislative vehicle through which the Labour government intends to return passenger train operations to public ownership as existing private franchises expire. Lords Amendment 1 would have altered how this process works. By voting it down, the Commons kept the government's preferred approach intact, clearing a significant path toward renationalisation of rail services that will directly affect millions of train passengers across England. The bill does not affect freight or infrastructure, which remain outside its scope. **The politics:** The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 294 Labour MPs and 33 Labour and Co-operative MPs voted with the government, joined by the Scottish National Party (8), the Greens (4) and the Social Democratic and Labour Party (2). The opposition came from Conservatives (94), Liberal Democrats (65), Reform UK (5) and the Democratic Unionist Party (4). This alignment reflects a broader ideological fault line over the role of the state in running public services. The bill had already navigated Commons committee stage in September 2024, where earlier Conservative-led amendments were rejected by large margins, before the Lords made their own modifications that the Commons has now overturned.
Voting Aye meant
Support the government rejecting the Lords' addition of a statutory 'passenger improvement' purpose clause, keeping the bill as originally passed by the Commons
Voting No meant
Support the Lords amendment requiring passenger service improvement to be the primary stated purpose of rail nationalisation, to hold the government accountable to passenger outcomes
516 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 129 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
294
0
68
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
94
22
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
65
7
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
33
0
9
Independent
5
4
5
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
8
0
1
Reform UKWhipped No
0
5
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2
0
—
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
—
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
1
0
—
Secretary of State rejected Lords amendments 1 and 2 as unnecessary, misleading, and costly; accepted amendment 3 on equality duty for disabled passengers.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,347 words) →
Supported all Lords amendments as reasonable measures to put passengers at the heart of the Bill and prevent ideological nationalisation without service improvement.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,056 words) →
Supported Government position; Lords amendments would disrupt orderly transfer and allow private operators to continue extracting dividends at taxpayer expense.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (865 words) →
Supported amendment 1 for clarity on passenger focus; initially proposed amendment 2 but withdrew support due to cost concerns; strongly backed amendment 3 on accessibility.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (324 words) →
Argued amendment 2 is pragmatic as it would prevent removal of well-performing franchises like c2c (94% satisfaction) while prioritising poor performers.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (555 words) →
Supported Government position; privatisation has failed, public ownership will reinvest £1.5 billion annually and improve services for constituents.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (550 words) →
Supported Government position on all amendments; SNP backs public ownership as already implemented in Scotland; amendment 2 would waste public money on fees.Scottish National Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (454 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0