Passenger Railway Services Bill (Public Ownership) Bill: Committee: Amendment 21
82
Ayes
—
360
Noes
Defeated · Government won
205 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** On 3 September 2024, MPs voted on Amendment 21 to the Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill during its Committee stage (the detailed line-by-line scrutiny phase of legislation). The amendment was defeated by 360 votes to 82. The Conservative Party tabled the amendment, though notably the Conservatives are absent from the voting data, suggesting they abstained or were not present in significant numbers. The 82 votes in favour came predominantly from the Liberal Democrats (68 votes), joined by the Green Party, Plaid Cymru, the Democratic Unionist Party, and a small number of independents. **Why it matters:** The Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill is the flagship Labour legislation to return passenger rail services in England to public ownership by ending the system of private rail franchises. Amendment 21 sought to modify the process by which this nationalisation would occur, with the amendment broadly framed around supporting modifications to the rail nationalisation process rather than its outright rejection. Its defeat means the government's preferred approach to transferring rail services into public hands remains intact, without the changes the amendment proposed. The bill, if passed in its government-preferred form, would bring passenger rail operators back under state control through a new public body, Great British Railways. **The politics:** The most striking feature of this vote is the coalition that voted in favour of the amendment. Rather than a straightforward government-versus-opposition division, the Liberal Democrats provided the bulk of the 82 aye votes, joined by the Greens and Plaid Cymru, parties that broadly support public ownership but may have had specific concerns about the terms or transition arrangements in this particular clause. Labour and its Co-operative Party colleagues voted unanimously against, defending the bill as written. This sits within a broader pattern from the same day's Committee votes, where similar amendments (14 and 17) were also defeated by large margins, and follows the bill's Second Reading on 29 July 2024, which passed 351 to 84.
Voting Aye meant
Support Amendment 21 to the Public Ownership rail bill, likely an attempt to modify or restrict the bill's approach to rail nationalisation
Voting No meant
Oppose Amendment 21, backing the government's bill to bring passenger rail services into public ownership without this modification
442 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 205 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
317
45
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
68
0
4
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
37
5
Independent
3
3
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
2
—
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
—
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
0
1
—
Opposes the Bill's ideological approach; demands rigorous impact assessments, independent oversight of DOHL's capacity, financial monitoring of public operators, and independent pay review body to prevent union-driven wage inflation without productivity gains.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (4,878 words) →
Supports the Bill as correcting 30 years of privatisation damage; emphasizes billions in profits transferred abroad and that Labour has thoroughly developed the policy, rejecting claims of haste.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (231 words) →
Strongly supports public ownership but warns that DfT officials may obstruct implementation; urges fast prioritisation of worst-performing franchises first and seeks clarity on removing clause 2(3) loopholes.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,468 words) →
Neutral on ownership model; demands independent review of passenger experience impacts, ticketing system overhaul, and mechanisms for devolved local bodies to run services under GBR guidance.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,476 words) →
Strongly supportive; defends public ownership against privatisation's dividend payouts to foreign governments; cites improved performance of DOHL-run services (LNER, TransPennine) and urges exploration of not-for-profit rolling stock financing.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,579 words) →
Supportive; emphasizes procurement reform and supply chain stability as critical for domestic rail manufacturing (Alstom Derby), requires detailed Government procurement strategy.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (764 words) →
Supportive of principle; proposes amendments to enable elected local bodies (combined authorities, councils) to own and operate companies bidding for franchises under GBR framework.Green Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (314 words) →
Defends the Bill and the recent ASLEF pay deal as delivering necessary reform; criticises previous Secretary of State's failed modernisation attempts.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,370 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0