Division · No. 310Tuesday, 14 October 2025Commons Mental Health

Mental Health Bill Report Stage: Amendment 41

164
Ayes
333
Noes
Defeated · Government won
148 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on Amendment 41 to the Mental Health Bill at report stage on 14 October 2025. The amendment, which would have modified provisions in the government's mental health legislation, was defeated by 333 votes to 164. Report stage is the point in the legislative process where MPs debate and vote on proposed changes to a bill that has already passed through committee scrutiny. **Why it matters:** The defeat of Amendment 41 means the government's original provisions in the Mental Health Bill will remain intact, at least as far as this amendment was concerned. The Mental Health Bill represents a significant overhaul of mental health law in England and Wales, and the precise terms of its provisions directly affect how patients can be detained, treated, and supported. Those who backed the amendment argued it would have strengthened patient rights or improved the legislation; the government and its supporters successfully argued the bill should proceed on its existing terms. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. Labour and Labour Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against the amendment (328 combined), while Conservatives (90 ayes) and Liberal Democrats (62 ayes) voted together in favour, joined by a handful of independents, Reform UK members, and the Democratic Unionist Party. The Greens sided with the government against the amendment. This division mirrors two other votes on the same day, Amendment 40 (defeated 163 to 339) and New Clause 26 (defeated 78 to 327), suggesting a sustained but unsuccessful opposition push to reshape the bill at report stage.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring formal involvement of a child's legal guardian or responsible person when a child is detained under the Mental Health Act, adding protective safeguards beyond existing guidance.
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, likely arguing existing provisions or guidance are sufficient and that statutory requirements are unnecessary or unworkable.
§ 01Who voted how.497 voting members · 148 absent
Aye166No335DID NOT VOTE · 148

497 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 148 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
297
65
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
62
0
10
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
31
11
Independent
7
3
3
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Zöe FranklinSupportiveGuildford
Proposes New Clause 2 requiring Secretary of State to publish national strategy on mental health units meeting CQC 'good' standards within 12 months, with annual progress reports to Parliament.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,440 words)
Judith CumminsNeutralBradford South
Facilitates discussion of multiple new clauses addressing children in foster care, accommodation adequacy, detention impact reviews, out-of-area placements, and children on adult wards.Unknown · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (18,558 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0