Football Governance Bill [HL]: Third Reading
415
Ayes
—
98
Noes
Passed · Government won
136 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 8 July 2025 to pass the Football Governance Bill at its Third Reading in the House of Commons, with 415 MPs voting in favour and 98 voting against. Third Reading is the final stage a bill passes through in the Commons before it moves on for Royal Assent, meaning this vote effectively confirmed the bill's passage into law. The result was a clear and decisive majority for the government's position. The bill creates an Independent Football Regulator for English football, with powers to oversee the financial sustainability of clubs, strengthen fan engagement requirements, and intervene where the governance of clubs falls short. In practical terms, this means professional football clubs in England will face external oversight for the first time, covering areas such as owners and directors tests, financial controls, and obligations to supporters. The legislation is intended to prevent a repeat of high-profile club collapses, such as those seen at Bury and Macclesfield, and to block any future attempt to create a closed super league breakaway competition. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. Labour and its Co-operative Party allies provided the overwhelming bulk of the 415 Ayes, joined unanimously by the Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru, and the Green Party. All 85 Conservative MPs who voted did so against the bill, joined by all six Reform UK MPs who participated and all four Democratic Unionist Party members who voted. There were no Conservative Aye votes and no Labour No votes. The bill's parliamentary journey included the defeat of several opposition amendments at Report Stage on the same day, including attempts to alter or restrict the regulator's remit, and a reasoned amendment opposing the bill entirely at Second Reading in April 2025, which was rejected by 337 votes to 74.
Voting Aye meant
Support creating an independent regulator for English football to protect clubs, fans, and the financial sustainability of the game
Voting No meant
Oppose the Football Governance Bill, likely citing concerns about state intervention in sport, regulatory burden on clubs, or the specific model of regulation proposed
513 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 136 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
299
0
63
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
85
31
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
63
0
9
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
36
0
6
Independent
7
2
4
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped No
0
6
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
—
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
—
Your Party
1
0
—
Opposes the Bill as political overreach; argues it risks regulatory scope creep, excessive costs on clubs, potential UEFA/FIFA conflicts, and lacks credibility due to governance concerns around the IFR chair's appointment.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (4,369 words) →
Defends the Bill as necessary to protect football fans and clubs from irresponsible owners; argues the regulator will be operationally independent and amendments are largely unnecessary given existing safeguards.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,612 words) →
Supports the Bill's principles but believes it could be strengthened with amendments on free-to-air TV access, mandatory golden shares for fans, human rights vetting of owners, gambling restrictions, and player welfare schemes.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,282 words) →
Supports the Bill but advocates strongly for new clause 13 on neurodegenerative care scheme for former players, arguing it addresses a moral obligation to footballers suffering from dementia and related conditions.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,524 words) →
Supports the Bill and advocates for new clause 8 on ticketing fairness and new clause 6 on financial abuse protections for players; argues football should remain accessible to working-class fans.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,175 words) →
Supports the Bill and amendments addressing player welfare from neurodegenerative conditions and strengthening fan protections, particularly the golden share concept.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (410 words) →
Questions Conservative consistency in opposing a Bill they drafted; expresses concern that neurodegenerative disease affecting players requires urgent action beyond the Bill.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (222 words) →
Supports the Bill; challenges Conservative hypocrisy on transparency regarding UEFA/FIFA correspondence and highlights that Conservatives originally promoted independent regulator concept.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,444 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0