Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill: New Clause 2
259
Ayes
—
216
Noes
Passed
170 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened**: On 13 June 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 2 to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill during its Committee of the Whole House stage. The clause passed by 259 votes to 216, a majority of 43. The vote was held on a free vote, meaning no party imposed a whipping instruction and MPs voted according to their individual conscience. **Why it matters**: New Clause 2 forms part of the core legislative architecture for a regulated assisted dying framework in England and Wales, advancing provisions that would allow terminally ill adults to seek assistance to end their lives under defined conditions and safeguards. The passage of this clause keeps the Bill moving forward through its parliamentary stages, meaning the prospect of a legal assisted dying system in England and Wales remains live. The vote affects patients with terminal diagnoses, medical professionals who may be asked to participate, and the broader healthcare system. **The politics**: The vote cut across conventional party lines, as is characteristic of conscience votes on ethical questions. Within the Labour Party, 122 MPs voted in favour and 150 against, reflecting a significant internal split. Conservatives divided 68 in favour and only 11 against, making them proportionally the most supportive party represented. Liberal Democrats divided almost evenly, 27 to 34 against. All five voting Democratic Unionist Party MPs supported the clause, while all four voting Green MPs opposed it. Reform UK voted 6 to 1 in favour. The Bill sits within a broader sequence of conscience votes on assisted dying that have defined one of the most contested legislative debates of the 2024-25 Parliament.
Voting Aye meant
Support adding clear statutory duties around guidance and devolved responsibilities to the assisted dying framework, including consulting medical experts and palliative care providers
Voting No meant
Oppose these particular provisions, either due to concerns about the bill itself or the specific approach to guidance and devolution
475 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 170 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
122
150
90
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
68
11
37
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
27
34
11
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
16
16
10
Independent
10
2
1
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
6
1
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5
0
—
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
—
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
3
1
—
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
—
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
1
0
—
Bill sponsor presenting amendments to improve regulatory framework, safeguards, and devolution compliance while ensuring palliative care and assisted dying work alongside each otherLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,870 words) →
Concerned that vulnerable groups (disabled people, ethnic minorities, those with mental health issues) remain insufficiently protected despite amendments; supports greater parliamentary scrutiny through affirmative procedure for statutory instrumentsLiberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,755 words) →
Seeks clarification on devolution implications and conversations with Scottish Government regarding extension of clauses to ScotlandLabour · Voted teller_aye · Read full speech (738 words) →
Questions the evidential basis for the Bill, citing case of terminal patient who exceeded prognosis; expresses concerns about protections for vulnerable groupsDemocratic Unionist Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (375 words) →
Supports new clause 6 proposing special representative for ethnic minorities to ensure fair treatment in assisted dying accessLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (965 words) →
As operating department practitioner, affirms that existing healthcare frameworks and safeguards in the Bill are adequate for drug managementLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (97 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0