Planning and Infrastructure Bill: Second Reading
330
Ayes
—
74
Noes
Passed · Government won
241 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 24 March 2025 to give the Planning and Infrastructure Bill its Second Reading, passing the measure by 330 votes to 74. A Second Reading is the first substantive vote on a bill in the Commons, approving its general principles before it moves to detailed scrutiny. The bill passed comfortably, with the government's majority delivering a clear win. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour, while the Liberal Democrats provided the largest bloc of opposition with 64 votes against. The bill sets out to transform England's planning system, with the government's stated goal of building 1.5 million homes during this Parliament and fast-tracking 150 major infrastructure projects. It would streamline how planning decisions are made, reform how legal challenges to major projects can be brought, and introduce a new approach to environmental obligations intended to replace the existing nutrient neutrality rules that ministers say have blocked thousands of homes. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner also announced on the day of the debate a further £2 billion for affordable housing and £600 million for construction skills training, including 60,000 new apprenticeships. The most notable feature of the division was the Liberal Democrats voting unanimously against, positioning themselves as defenders of local planning controls and community consultation rather than supporting the government's top-line housing ambitions. The Conservatives, while offering partial support for the bill's principles, did not vote as a bloc against it, with their shadow housing spokesman Kevin Hollinrake indicating conditional backing for its aims alongside significant reservations. Plaid Cymru and the Democratic Unionist Party also voted against. The Greens, notably, voted in favour. The bill subsequently progressed through Report Stage and passed its Third Reading on 10 June 2025 by 306 votes to 174, with opposition growing as the legislation was amended.
Voting Aye meant
Support the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, backing a major overhaul of the planning system to accelerate housebuilding and infrastructure delivery
Voting No meant
Oppose the Bill, with concerns including insufficient local consultation, inadequate powers to force developers to build on existing permissions, or the overall approach to planning reform
404 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 241 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
290
0
72
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
64
8
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
36
0
6
Independent
1
4
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
1
6
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
2
3
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
4
—
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
—
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
1
0
—
Bill is essential to get Britain building again; transforms planning to deliver 1.5m homes and infrastructure while protecting communities and nature through better consultation and streamlined processes.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,912 words) →
While supporting some principles, the Bill's 1.5m target is undeliverable; removing councillor powers is anti-democratic; housing targets unfairly shift burden to rural areas; concerns about environmental protections and lack of investment in skills.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (3,581 words) →
Welcomes compulsory purchase reforms and nature restoration fund, but criticises Henry VIII clauses and removal of community voice; argues councillors approve 85-90% of applications and are not the blocker; advocates community-led development.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (2,962 words) →
Constituents want homes but demand proper consultation, right location and scale; objects to ignoring local views through mandatory local plans.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (89 words) →
Welcomes affordable housing expansion but raises concern that Gypsies and Travellers have been systematically discriminated against and excluded from planning provisions.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (117 words) →
Supports speedier planning but warns against removing right to object to major projects; cites National Grid Sea Link converter station as example of legitimate public concern.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (92 words) →
Seeks clarification on Heathrow expansion process and expresses concern about removing compulsory purchase consultees from pre-application stage.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (105 words) →
Bill offers opportunity to reform planning after Conservative mismanagement; advocates stronger council housing programmes, land value capture, and environmental limits on growth.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (869 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0