Water (Special Measures) Bill - Government motion to insist on Commons Amendment 2 and to propose Amendment (a) in lieu
331
Ayes
—
65
Noes
Passed · Government won
250 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on 11 February 2025 to insist on the government's preferred version of Amendment 2 to the Water (Special Measures) Bill, rejecting modifications that the House of Lords had introduced. The government also proposed a replacement amendment (Amendment (a) in lieu) as part of the same motion. The vote passed by 331 ayes to 65 noes, a majority of 266. **Why it matters:** The Water (Special Measures) Bill is designed to tighten regulation of water companies in England and Wales, addressing issues including sewage discharges and executive pay. This vote concerned a specific clause where the Lords had sought to strengthen accountability measures beyond what the government proposed. By insisting on its own version and offering a replacement amendment in lieu, the government maintained control over the precise scope and wording of those provisions. The outcome shapes how water companies will be regulated, what powers Ofwat (the water industry regulator) will hold, and what penalties and oversight mechanisms will apply. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 317 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the government, while the Liberal Democrats (63 votes) and Plaid Cymru (4 votes) voted against, preferring the Lords' approach. The Conservatives did not vote at all, with all 116 absent. The four Green MPs voted with the government, as did the Democratic Unionist Party and Ulster Unionist representatives. The division reflects a recurring tension in this Bill's passage, with the Lords repeatedly pressing for stronger protections and the Commons, dominated by the Labour majority, consistently restoring the government's preferred text.
Voting Aye meant
Support the government's revised amendment to the Water (Special Measures) Bill, backing Labour's approach to regulating water companies
Voting No meant
Prefer the Lords' version of the amendment, or oppose the government's handling of water company regulation in this bill
396 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 250 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
285
0
77
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
63
9
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
32
0
10
Independent
6
0
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
4
—
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
—
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
0
0
1
Government minister defending amendments to introduce financial reporting requirements and rejecting statutory instrument approval process for Ofwat rules to avoid delay and protect regulator independence.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,104 words) →
Acknowledges Government concessions on transparency but criticises lack of full accountability mechanisms; ultimately supports Bill to prevent failure despite wanting stronger oversight powers.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,656 words) →
Welcomes financial reporting amendment but advocates for much more radical reform including stricter bonus controls and replacement of Ofwat with a clean water authority; pushes for six-month advance notice of bonuses.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (2,162 words) →
Questions whether Ofwat will actually enforce debt level limits despite having powers; seeks assurance amendment includes enforcement mechanisms.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (83 words) →
Defends importance of Ofwat's independence and notes Bill's bonus ban represents Government progress compared to previous Conservative inaction.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (90 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0