Division · No. 17Tuesday, 8 October 2024Commons Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Opposition Day: Farming and food security

187
Ayes
359
Noes
Defeated · Government won
104 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on 8 October 2024 on an opposition day motion (a debate and vote brought by the opposition parties rather than the government) criticising the government's farming policies. The motion focused on agricultural inheritance tax changes and food security concerns. The motion was defeated by 359 votes to 187, with the government's majority holding comfortably. **Why it matters:** The motion centred on proposed changes to agricultural property relief, a form of inheritance tax protection that has long shielded farmland from being taxed when passed between generations. Critics argued the changes threaten family farms and food production, since farmers with land-rich but income-poor businesses may be forced to sell land to meet tax bills. Food security was also raised as a broader concern, with opponents of the government's approach warning that weakening farm viability could reduce domestic food production. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 317 Labour MPs and 36 Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against the motion, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, and all smaller parties including the DUP, Plaid Cymru, Reform UK, and the Ulster Unionist Party voted in favour. There were no notable cross-party rebels on either side. The motion reflects an early fault line between the new Labour government and rural and farming communities, with the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats finding common cause in opposing what they characterise as damaging agricultural taxation policy.

Voting Aye meant
Support the Conservative motion pressing the government to do more to protect British farming and strengthen food security
Voting No meant
Reject the Conservative motion, with Labour arguing their own approach to farming and food security is adequate or superior
§ 01Who voted how.546 voting members · 104 absent
Aye188No357DID NOT VOTE · 104

546 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 104 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
317
45
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
102
0
14
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
65
0
7
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
36
6
Independent
6
3
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4
0
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Steve BarclayOpposedNorth East Cambridgeshire
Demands immediate payment of £50m farming recovery fund, confirmation of budget protection, and commitment to keep farm-to-fork summit and tenant farming commissioner; criticises Labour for de-prioritising farming.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,364 words)
Steve ReedSupportiveStreatham and Croydon North
Defends inheritance of failed schemes, promises new deal for farmers including energy bill cuts, trade deal improvements, and long-term environmental integration; criticises Conservative underspends and flood defence failures.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (3,259 words)
Tim FarronQuestioningWestmorland and Lonsdale
Advocates £1bn additional farming budget, on-farm advice funding, protection of tenant farmers, and bespoke environmental schemes; criticises both Conservatives' botched ELM transition and risks Labour will bake in underspends.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,205 words)
Challenges Barclay on why £300m allocated farming support was not spent under previous government.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (42 words)
Jesse NormanQuestioningHereford and South Herefordshire
Raises concerns about River Wye farming support funding and integration of environmental outcomes with flood resilience.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (189 words)
Sir John HayesQuestioningSouth Holland and The Deepings
Emphasises need for food security strategy, rebalancing retail power, automation without displacing small farmers, and government procurement supporting British produce.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (707 words)
Dr Roz SavageSupportiveSouth Cotswolds
Advocates for attracting young farmers through land access, integrated multi-purpose land use, and addresses sewage pollution threatening agricultural land and rivers.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,929 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0