Division · No. 10Wednesday, 4 September 2024Commons Economy

Budget Responsibility Bill: Committee: Amendment 9

109
Ayes
366
Noes
Defeated · Government won
172 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 4 September 2024, the House of Commons voted on Amendment 9 to the Budget Responsibility Bill at Committee stage. The amendment, tabled by the Conservatives, was defeated by 366 votes to 109. The government successfully defended its approach to the legislation, with the large majority reflecting Labour's commanding position in the Commons following the July 2024 general election. **Why it matters:** The Budget Responsibility Bill introduces new rules governing how significant fiscal announcements must be scrutinised by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the independent body that assesses the government's finances. The amendment sought to alter those arrangements, with Conservatives arguing for changes to the fiscal oversight framework. Its defeat means the government's version of the bill advances unchanged, strengthening formal requirements for independent economic scrutiny of major spending and tax decisions. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 102 voting Conservatives backed the amendment, joined by all four Reform UK MPs and both voting Democratic Unionist Party members, giving the opposition 109 ayes. Labour and its Co-operative partners provided the overwhelming bulk of the 366 noes, with only one Labour MP breaking ranks to vote with the Conservatives. The Scottish National Party did not vote. The bill sits in a broader context of the government positioning itself against what it characterised as the fiscal irresponsibility of the previous administration, and subsequent votes on the Finance Bill and budget resolutions in late 2024 continued that same dividing line.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring the OBR to independently scrutinise any changes to the government's fiscal rules, ensuring greater transparency and accountability when ministers alter their own borrowing and spending targets
Voting No meant
Oppose extending the OBR assessment trigger to cover fiscal rule changes, backing the government's narrower version of the Bill which focuses on unfunded spending commitments
§ 01Who voted how.475 voting members · 172 absent
Aye111No366DID NOT VOTE · 172

475 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 172 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
1
324
37
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
102
0
14
Liberal Democrats
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
37
5
Independent
2
3
9
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4
0
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Nigel HuddlestonOpposedDroitwich and Evesham
Amendment 9 should require OBR reports on changes to fiscal rules themselves, not just measures below thresholds; accuses Labour of planning to change debt definition to hide borrowing.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,673 words)
Dr Jeevun SandherSupportiveLoughborough
Maiden speech supporting fiscal responsibility and green investment to build prosperity; welcomes Bill as enabling growth rather than constraining it.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,229 words)
Andrew GriffithOpposedArundel and South Downs
Bill is disreputable political theatre that surrenders Parliament's responsibilities to unelected OBR; definition of 'fiscally significant' is dangerously vague and catches too many legitimate decisions.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,598 words)
Stella CreasySupportiveWalthamstow
Supports Bill and amendments 6-7 to capture cumulative fiscal impacts, especially PFI debt which represents catastrophic value-for-money failure requiring independent scrutiny.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,804 words)
Sarah OlneySupportiveRichmond Park
Amendments 1-4 strengthen Bill by broadening 'fiscally significant' to include interest rate/growth impacts and requiring consultation on Charter changes; Bill essential safeguard after mini-Budget.Liberal Democrat · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (654 words)
Dave DooganOpposedAngus and Perthshire Glens
Bill is toothless: OBR cannot stop budgets, only comment on them; does nothing to prevent austerity; Labour's £22bn black hole claim is exaggerated to justify attacks on pensioners.SNP · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,589 words)
Amanda MartinSupportivePortsmouth North
Maiden speech emphasizing fiscal responsibility as foundation for opportunity; Bill enables real change after Tory chaos that left constituents unable to afford mortgages and rent.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,156 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0